The neighbours were happy and offered to help fix up her fence in exchange. Randos on Twitter weren't because she... didn't get their neighbours' consent or something.
Frost: those are some nice forearms you have there, would be a shame if they got scratched up
The twitter randos probably find the violence of physically force-feeding someone to be less objectionable than the crime against humanity of potentially creating a mildly awkward social interaction. They are, after all, twitter users.
Were they mad because it had beans in it or because it didn't have beans in it?
:bean-think:
The neighbours were happy and offered to help fix up her fence in exchange. Randos on Twitter weren't because she... didn't get their neighbours' consent or something.
she didn't force feed them the chilli right
Are you in an emotionally stable place to receive some chilli
this needs to be a tagline
She had Rufus the Pig corner them when she spooned Chili down their throats. It was a massacre!
Frost: those are some nice forearms you have there, would be a shame if they got scratched up :meow-knife-trans:
The twitter randos probably find the violence of physically force-feeding someone to be less objectionable than the crime against humanity of potentially creating a mildly awkward social interaction. They are, after all, twitter users.
You are leaving out the worst offender: some beans, but NOT ENOUGH.
No. Half. Measures.
that never came up! thousands of posts on soup consent and no one talked about the beans/no beans controversy!