title tone indicator: heavy sarcasm
You must log in or # to comment.
And how does he imagine sharing the news with his grown adult women daughters that he's arranged a marriage for them?
With a fucking husband from 4chan no less. Good luck daughter, you're gonna need it.
it is worth noting that neither Irish nor British law (he could be in northern Ireland) in any way recognises his right to do this. So I would assume they would just not
I'm pretty sure forced marriages are illegal in pretty much every country. Even in India and Pakistan, which are known for arranged marriages, by the law nobody can technically force you to marry someone. Only thing is your family might put immense pressure on you and might, in extreme cases, threaten to disown you if you don't marry that person. In countries like that there's also cultural pressure, which obviously doesn't exist in Ireland, and stronger family ties, so I'm assuming if he threatens to disown them they probably wouldn't care
Edit: could threatening to disown/withdraw financial support over something like that be considered coercion? In the US parents have the "right" to do that, idk about Ireland though
In my experience most UK and Irish parents (I include UK as there are similar levels of wealth and culture about parenting) don't have the money to support their kids much to begin with certainly not enough to force them to marry a 40 year old. probably the 27 year old sister and 23 year old could together offer each other and the 19 year old more or less all the support the dad could
I assume he's gonna try to set them up. You have no idea how insane people get online this chick tried to segue into saying she was cheating and also to just lie to her bf, who had come home while I was en route, saying I was her uncle. I am 23
Imagine being almost 50 and going on 4chan to set up your young children.
4chan launched in 2003. 4chan may have been a part of this freak's life longer than his youngest daughter.
genuinely surprised they get to that point tbh, I always figured they're universally incels with repellent personalities that don't get out much, but I guess you can hide a repellent personality. If I had a husband I'd file for divorce the millisecond I saw him using a chan.
fantasy
Well, GarbageShoot looked it up
I looked it up and he adds:
I've been addicted to BBC porn for a few months and can't help but think what's gonna happen to them
Some people say porn is harmless but I say that while we are still working with population that is still too fucking dumb to know fiction from reality, porn becomes dangerous.
I seriously think porn is largely responsible for the incel movement and that has resulted in actual terrorist attacks
people with these attitudes have always existed, but a century ago they arranged/pressured a marriage on someone who had little recourse to refuse
That anyone has had such an attitude is a very different question from how many have had the attitude at different times and how the internet and misogynistic media help to enculturate people to adopting these views. I'm sure you would agree that the problem isn't just that some people have souls made of gold or silver while others have souls made of copper, right?
this is a very confusing comment, genuinely i'm unsure what you're trying to say.
i'm recasting the 'blame' for incels on patriarchy at large, not confining it to pornography. the incel movement is a reaction to men not being able to as easily coerce women into sex, not a consequence of seeing skin on your iphone. if accessible pornography were such a powerful force for patriarchy, surely its emergence would harkened more than a handful of stochastic terrorists
If you think pornography as it exists in our society can be reduced to "seeing skin", there's no point in talking to you further. You know, aren't you one of the types who always brings up (correctly) how the prevalence of e.g. choking in porn has lead to young men emulating these acts (often without warning, much less consent) both on the women who had freely consented to sex and those who had been paid to consent to sex? And that this has produced many injuries and occasionally even death?
If porn is something someone can be addicted to, something that has medically diagnosable effects that impact people's real-life relationships and cause sexual dysfunctions, can we still reduce it this way?
Some symptoms are more widespread than others, and incels by definition are a small and non-reproducing subset of the population that exists on the margins of society. It only makes sense that other strata react differently.
I'm not trying to take shit away from you or tell you not to use it, do as you will, but let's attempt to maintain a measure of intellectual honesty.
the incel movement is a reaction to men not being able to as easily coerce women into sex
What creates the situation where they "need" to do that, to get laid in the first place?
That's what dominates my thinking on the matter.
Granted, I'm also starting from the assumption that I don't think you're gonna make a society where people don't want sex, or don't get mad about not being able to engage in it. I do genuinely think that this is a hardwired thing, and even if it isn't, at a social level if you don't at least have the opportunity to be able to find a partner (regardless of whether you choose to exercise it), then you are not really anything more than a drone, or fundamentally a servile being in the context of whatever society you're in. You would exist exclusively to materially furnish & support the lives & families of people who are, in that respect at least, your social superior, and I don't expect people to not be mad about that.
Edit: At the very least, I think the things that I'm saying are accurate in so far as they describe dynamics that exist within society as it currently exists, anyways.
I've often wondered if a lack of age-appropriate socialization with girls is why some boys grow up to be incels. I had a childhood friend who had pretty much the same school social circles, non-school social circles, hobbies, church, you name it. But he was an only child with no female cousins. I have a younger sister and a ton of younger female cousins. He grew up with some strange ideas about girls. I remember constantly telling him - right from elementary school - when he was being weird about them.
For much of my teen years I only had female peer socialization once or twice a week. By my mid-20s, the slight majority of my friends have been women.
So YMMV, although I suspect I might be the exception. Or maybe there's lots of factors- personal gender identity, background culture, family composition, parenting style, sexuality...
I had a friend who had gone to boys only schools all his life, doesn't have any female relatives other than his mother. One time he sat down and asked me how I talk to girls so easily. I had to explain to him that girls are like boys in that they are human beings. I've never once seen him talk to a girl. He's 20
I grew up mainly around my mom & my sister, but that has not really done anything to improve my ability to relate to, or engage with women on anything.
I did also spend like 90% of my non-school time shut up in my room, playing videogames, cause no friends & my mom drank a lot.
You don't need to fall for it, in order to internalize porn's subtle, sublime ideology.
you know, I was listening to the latest QAA and was thinking about the whole "people have a weird tendency to use politics and philosophy as a outlet for their sexual hangups" thing earlier
Hahahahaha I was wondering when someone would look this up and ask why I had stuck my hand all the way into /soc/
Makes sense this is more likely to be fake based on that research ty @GarbageShoot@hexbear.net
Dumpster diving day
I can't stomach 4chan but I have sometimes made a pastime of observing other reactionary hellholes (ones where I mostly don't get flashed with porn) to try to understand what is going on with these people a little more.Marx's motto was the quote from Terence "Nothing Human Is Alien to Me" and I don't nearly live up to that even to the extent he did, but I see the merit in it.
I like to make weird online theme days in my month it's kind of like deciding to do kale on wednesdays
Oh well yeah my parents think there are pockpockets in Safeway. These people are not in our world
Pffft, a true Trad father would only marry off his daughters for livestock, land, and/or to form an alliance.
That does seem to be the intention, what with him trying to set these gals up with dudes almost twice their age.
What benefit is there to the husband being 40+? Wouldn't a younger husband be more fit to "defend" them in this dude's violent fantasies?
he wants someone closer to his and way of thinking to control his daughter the way he wants to control his daughter
I see, makes sense in an unfortunate way. Speaking of, I looked it up and he adds:
I've been addicted to BBC porn for a few months and can't help but think what's gonna happen to them
Anyway so much of what's on that site is spam that this is probably another scammer who just knows what his audience is into.
fucking stupid bitchass 2016 trump simp normies shitting up my damn boards on my damn fish farming website with their politics, I wish /pol/ got nuked and every IP which posted there in the past 7 years permabanned, look at the damn reddit spacing and idioms on that philistine's post jfc
Most people aren't ready to be parents at age 22.
This guy is still not qualified as a parent at age 49.
Seeing people lose their mind in here over some 4chan shitpost that is 100% made up RP is both funny and sad.
Making up statistics is not a good look. And we all know 4chan is a cesspool.
They outgrew their edgelord phase and stopped visiting 4chan, right?
