The mods have shown how they do not care about the posters opinions they just ban people whenever they fgeel like it. Take a look at the mod logs if you care youll see these weird ban reasons like "wrecking" and "sectarianism". The reason why these terms exist is to attack the people with different opinions and the way they get silenced is by the power the mods and admins use. Ive asked so many times for democratic moderation why is it that we cant have it? If the mods gave a shit about their "socialism" as much as their "democratic control over the means of production" wouldnt they give the posters even have the power to influence bans?

  • socialist [she/her]
    hexagon
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 years ago

    He did fucking twisting history so you can feel good about your authoritarianism

    • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      I mean if you won't even acknowledge objective historical fact, there is no reason to really bother arguing with you. Go outside.

      • socialist [she/her]
        hexagon
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 years ago

        ASSAD WAS A DICTATOR PEOPLE WANTED TO CHOOSE THE GHOUL IN CHARGE AND ASSAD STARTED BOMBING THEM HOW IMPERIALIST IS IT