Why is using and re-using, modifying and adapting others' "intellectual property" cool and good and should be done without any barriers but using and adapting others'cultural traits to create something new ought be prohibited? Culture is just a temporal and geographical expression of human creativity and adaptation to circumstances - no one owns any of it, no one can bar others from any of it!
Right, but I guess the picture gets a bit muddled when you have an oppressive/genocidal culture destroying and othering another culture and then turns around and uses their victims' practices/regalia as a costume. People of that latter group may want to hold on to a part of their identity that was being stamped out.
Also if there are people who have a custom or ritual that they think is special and want to keep something sacred to themselves, then maybe let them have it
Why is using and re-using, modifying and adapting others' "intellectual property" cool and good and should be done without any barriers but using and adapting others'cultural traits to create something new ought be prohibited? Culture is just a temporal and geographical expression of human creativity and adaptation to circumstances - no one owns any of it, no one can bar others from any of it!
Right, but I guess the picture gets a bit muddled when you have an oppressive/genocidal culture destroying and othering another culture and then turns around and uses their victims' practices/regalia as a costume. People of that latter group may want to hold on to a part of their identity that was being stamped out.
Also if there are people who have a custom or ritual that they think is special and want to keep something sacred to themselves, then maybe let them have it
Thats always been my understanding, especially when people steal culture to profit from it in some way.
Ah gotcha. I wasnt sure if Rev was earnest or playing the part of a neoliberal haha