“The movement have now deflated tyres on around 9,000 SUVs in cities across the world since March, striking continuously, and look set to surpass their goal of 10,000 SUVs deflated by Christmas,” the statement added.

The group has said its aim is “to make it impossible to own an SUV in the world’s urban areas”, condemning the vehicles as “unnecessary ‘luxury emissions’, flaunted by the wealthy, that are a climate disaster, cause air pollution and make our roads more dangerous”.

lol, lmao

  • Flinch [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    reddit slash fuck cars is having a hand wringing field day over this one. Apparently, this is a "step too far" and will only "push people away" and "poison the message" or some such nonsense

  • StewartCopelandsDad [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The campaign is coordinated via a website that hosts instructions on using lentils or other pulses to jam open the valves on SUV tyres, slowly deflating them.

    i'd rather you blew up some oil refineries but this is good too. lentil gang rise up

  • culpritus [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I've been subconsciously lathing this one for a while. The bit about not causing any damaged and only letting the air out not being a crime is pretty funny too.

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    2 years ago

    i dont give a shit if this is in any place with robust public transit tbh. in Yankeeland it might be bad tactics but mf every SUV or oversized truck on the streets of a well endowed city is a crime against the people

    unlimited violence to the SUV Kulaks, consideration shall be extended to the proletarians of buttfuck Nebraska until such a time as they get a trolley system. :sicko-fem: then we come for theirs too

  • betelgeuse [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Really need to hit dealerships. They're all in one place and you can prevent them from being sold to begin with. Also you need to do more than let air out of the tires. They'll just make some mechanic go around and fill them back up, making their job harder. You really need to make them buy new tires. Then purchasing, receiving, and accounting have to get involved. They have to source new tires. They have to wait on delivery. They have to pay way more money than making some 19 year old trainee fill up tires. Cause a tire shortage for SUVs. Can't sell them without tires. Can't really transport them anywhere either.

  • InternetLefty [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    If it makes someone think twice about buying an SUV when they can take a train then I think it's a good thing. Although there are plenty of working class people who are car dependent because of crappy public transport infrastructure in the US, and some SUVs are a good option for driving in snowy winter weather (and in fact other options like a 2WD car may not work at all) and it wouldn't be right for them to be caught up in this. Of course it's easy to tell them apart from the petit bourg big car obsessed - one of them is usually 10 model years behind the other

      • FlakesBongler [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        :this:

        No one is gonna be like "Oh no, guess I'll have to learn how to ride the bus"

        They're going to demand greater police presence and get more paranoid and violent

        Now, if they could do this to, I don't know, a fleet of ICE trucks or the ham wagons they put in Piggy Parking, that would be great

        • Chred01 [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          These actions objectively reduce SUV sales in affected areas, which objectively reduces CO2 emissions.

          Last months book recommendation on this site was “how to blow up a pipeline” which goes into this exact same tactic in greater detail. Read it, and stop worrying about inconveniencing the worst people you know irl.

          • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            and stop worrying about inconveniencing the worst people you know irl.

            srsly, can't understand why people are pearl clutching here unless it's the feds clutching at the bukkake that the oil execs dressed them with

          • THC
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • Chred01 [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Honestly not digging it up for you, no shade just trying to cook dinner. 2019 Sweden actions like this led to a reduction in SUV sales in affected areas, that should be enough to go on to find the primary source.

        • JuneFall [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Dealership -> Cameras, high alert after the few cases, high risk for everyone involved

          • FlakesBongler [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Private house -> cameras, increased police presence after a couple visits, high risk for getting shot by angry Chuds or pigs

            • JuneFall [none/use name]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think most of those cases were done at SUVs which were parked outside on the road.

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      As someone who lives in a European city with a robust public transit network, if you had a family with a bunch of kids you'd probably want a car anyway, unless you were like a fanatically committed Green Party voter

      spoiler

      ... or poor

      • InternetLefty [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Eh, maybe if you're just zipping around town it's fine. However if you live in a poor town or a poor part of town my experience has been that the city does not give enough of a fuck to do a good job plowing. Plus ice and slush are still a concern even on plowed roads sometimes. And some folks don't have a job they can afford to miss or be late for when the weather turns shitty.

        I do agree on the 4wd cars not needing to be big point

  • bloop [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is dumb. How is inconveniencing individuals, most of whom probably aren’t rich, going to accomplish anything? Not a single person is going to sell their SUV over this.

    • Chred01 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      “How to Blow Up a Pipeline” was literally last months book club recommendation on this site. Read it.

      :read-theory:

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        That's the argument for this, but the argument against it is:

        1. It's small enough scale that it does not meaningfully impact climate change (the book isn't titled "How To Smash A Gas Station Window")
        2. What it might do is get some comrades criminal records, generate spiteful opposition to climate action, and provide fresh material for "violent antifa terrorists" narratives that whip libs back in line anytime the zone gets too cool

        Focusing efforts on institutional polluters seems like a lot better use of energy.

        • Chred01 [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Luckily the book has a lot more content than just the title, and advocates with a compelling argument for this exact same action.

          Any anti-capitalist or anti-climate action has the risk of a criminal record, that’s baked into the cake of the system BY DESIGN.

          on institutional polluters seems like a lot better use of energy

          Great, we can do both. Bad news though, both of your counter-arguments apply 100 fold to anyone who wants to blow up an oil pipeline.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'm legit interested in hearing the argument for small-scale stuff like this. It seems like all risk and no reward.

            both of your counter-arguments apply 100 fold to anyone who wants to blow up an oil pipeline

            A pipeline is at least big enough to make waves on a national or even international scale. Look at the impact of Russia taking Nord Stream 1 offline. That kind of impact justifies all the stuff in the second point, and makes the action itself more defensible.

            • Chred01 [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m legit interested in hearing the argument for small-scale stuff like this.

              Then read the book the title of which you used as a foundation of your argument. The basics are that when this action took place in 2019 it saw a very significant dip in SUV sales in Sweden as a response.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  If we throw enough people in prison for drugs, will that lower the incidence of drug use? General deterrence mostly doesn't work.

              • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                We're talking about it right now -- can you give even a sentence or two on this point? I can't go and read a whole book immediately.

                • Chred01 [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  I just did.

                  The basics are that when this action took place in 2019 it saw a very significant dip in SUV sales in Sweden as a response.

          • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'm going to call it no one worried about the criminality of vandalism is going to blow up a pipeline

        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          provide fresh material for “violent antifa terrorists” narratives that whip libs back in line anytime the zone gets too cool

          They literally make stuff up, or continue talking about petty vandalism cases from decades ago. "Providing material" is meaningless, they're clutching their pearls about how we're violent superterrorists regardless of whether we've done anything at all. May as well meet their expectations at that point.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            The people who buy whatever story is put in front of them are pretty far from being reachable anyway. I'm talking about people who don't buy "antifa terrorism" stuff as a matter of course, but who aren't on board enough to think it's kinda sorta alright if there's a real example.

      • VenetianMask [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It's really cool that we've developed a culture of reading not for knowledge but for vanity.

          • VenetianMask [any]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You disagreed with someone just now. And you read a book so that you could tell them you read a book. Not to impart or distribute knowledge or actually argue back. You just showed them your merit badge and laughed at them for not having the same one as you. What's the point of reading books? What's the point of learning things?

            • Chred01 [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Nah, I gave the general gist of the argument all over this post actually. I also gave some keywords for people to investigate similar actions in Sweden in 2019.

              Sorry I’m cooking dinner and don’t have time to share my book report for people that don’t actually want to read anything about the topic.

              If you’re interested in finding out more literally google the book title and read some reviews, or go dive into some of the book club threads from last month on this very website.

              What else would you like me to do in order to pass your bar of “reading for vanity”?

                • Chred01 [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Here’s a wild fucking idea. If you aren’t willing to have a productive argument with someone, don’t start it!

                  Here’s a wild fucking idea! Maybe me telling someone to read a book isn’t actually me arguing with them but is instead, idk, recommending that they read the book that I’m mentioning!

                  Hilarious accusing me of :reddit-logo: but then instantly assuming mentioning that someone should read a book related to the topic at hand is engaging in an argument.

                  I’ve relayed a point over and over again. This action helped reduce SUV sales in Sweden in 2019, if you’d like to know more read last months book club selection “how to blow up a pipeline”.

                  Fuck. Never though I’d get this kind of reaction from recommending a fucking book to read.

                • Staines [they/them]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yes you do seem like an expert on self-masturbatory posts.

    • LeninsRage [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah I'm sorry but this is clown shit. This barely qualifies as "propaganda of the deed" and only because its way easier to slash the tires of an unattended vehicle than shoot a head of state or CEO

    • save_vs_death [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      this is europe not the US, people are not obligated to have cars and if out of all cars to have, you chose a large, loud, polluting car that makes it less safe for everyone to be in a city, you are in fact, rich

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are SUV's even driven by wealthy people these days? I feel like this is rehashing culture war shit from 20 years ago. Like, it's pretty ridiculous to go after SUVs when those oversized pickup trucks are sitting right there.

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I don't see anything about pickup trucks in their website. Going over the website, their praxis starts to make a lot more sense. It seems like this group originated in the UK. Their American English pamphlet, in contrast to the "just English" version, still manages to have British spelling in it. I guess SUV's have a different customer base in the UK because all the people I know who own SUV's are working class lol. Plus, the UK has functional public transit, so there's less excuses to own an SUV.

          I think this is just a classic example of praxis that would work in one country not working in another country.

      • Plants [des/pair]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah I was thinking the same. Those horrible pick ups are worse than SUVs. I'm down to deflate both tho

    • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      edit: okay guys fine I guess they're not slashing tires they're just wasting time doing next to nothing

        • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          fuck me for assuming "deflating" meant slashing the tire when they say they want to "make it impossible to own a SUV" :shrug-outta-hecks:

          • Chred01 [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Could just read the article before making a multiple paragraph response about how it would have such a detrimental effect on you and your family’s well being.

            I get it, I come from a working class family that drives SUVs as well, but come on just read the article at a minimum.

            • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don't care enough to read every article that gets posted here and tbh if that's all they're doing they're literally wasting their time on performance art, a car powered air pump costs literally $40 wow they're really making ownership impossible :fidel-salute:

              • Chred01 [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                The book “how to blow up a pipeline” which was this websites book recommendation last month advocates for this exact action, and similar action in Sweden in 2019 proved effective in reducing SUV sales. You can denigrate the action as much as you’d like, doesn’t change the fact that it has worked.

                • RonJeremyCorbyn [none/use name]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Not trying to provoke, but is there, like, quantitative evidence to support that inference? I'd be skeptical to leap to that conclusion (re effect on SUV sales)

        • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          whatever I do with my life is none of your business and doesn't change "letting air out of tires by deflation" from being weak shit when their stated goal is "make it impossible to own an SUV"

          portable air pumps exist but wow go kings

      • ElGosso [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        They're not even slashing tires, they're letting the air out. At most your mom would have to spend half an hour putting a spare on and then driving to a gas station to refill the old one.

  • Kumikommunism [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    These comments show both that: 1) this website is painfully American, and 2) Americans don't know anything about other countries

      • Kumikommunism [they/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Sort of, yeah. There's much more of a divide between a small car and a large car. "Mid-sized SUVS" didn't really exist in Europe until the last decade and now they are only kind of popular. Mainly because of engine-size and fuel regulations, and tighter restrictions on what constitutes a "large vehicle" in urban areas. Hatchbacks have always been much more common if someone wants a 5-door vehicle.

        Basically, in most of Europe, in order to own the disgustingly large SUVs that are common in America, you have to pay a lot of taxes, or live outside the city.

  • Chred01 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Half of hexbear users drive SUVs and it shows.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Love to assume bad things about my comrades when they disagree with me. There's no way they could possibly disagree otherwise!

      • Chred01 [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Love to stalk my comrades around and make snide comments on their obviously joke posts after saying I won’t respond to their arguments anymore!

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          You're being an ass all over this thread over criticism as mild as "I don't think this will work."

          • Chred01 [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Okay. You said you were done replying to me, and I’d appreciate it if you’d stop stalking me around and continuing to engage with me. I don’t believe you are arguing in good faith, and I feel uncomfortable with someone called “420blazeit69” seeking me out specifically to make sarcastic comments towards me.

            Please stop. Leave me alone.

            Done posting, came out of a long hibernation on this site and it looks like I’m going right back in.

    • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Upbeared not because I necessarily agree about prison but because any adventurous Chapos who want to do this should be thinking about ring cams.

  • amber2 [she/her,they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don't think this will save the world, but it's a massive step up from Extinction Rebellion so :rat-salute:

  • Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not really sure how to feel about this one. While the "this is going to push people away" argument is pretty typical libshit, I have a really hard time imagining how this is going to do anything but piss off anyone who isn't extremely invested in the cause. And yes I know this is a thing Andreas Malm talked about, I loved that book but I was skeptical of this tactic when he was discussing it too. Am I being dumb here?

    • danisth [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don't think you're being dumb, but you're definitely being a :LIB:

      Is this action going to help their cause? Nah probably not. Should we care if it's going to "push people away?" Definitely not. They're doing more than I am sitting here posting on this website.

      • FRIENDLY_BUTTMUNCHER [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, it has been demonstrated to reduce the purchase of new SUV's in an area experiencing frequent tyre deflations. It objectively reduces CO2 emissions, so I'll say it's a good thing.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I'm incredibly skeptical of that claim. General deterrence likely doesn't work even when you throw people in prison, but it's supposed to work when the consequence is occasional tire deflation?

            How many people are even aware of this?

            • CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Tbh people are angry enough that it's made much wider news than I expected the few times it's happened, but yeah the prison comparison is a strong point.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Compare it to speeding tickets, then. How well do they keep most people from speeding?

              • Chred01 [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Comparing throwing people that are addicted to drugs into prison instead of giving them access to healthcare to people deflating car tires is in no way a “strong point”.

              • drhead [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I think it might not be people directly worried about tire deflation, that simply won't ever happen enough for people to realistically worry about it. But the message going along with it being spread, is probably making people think about whether they actually need an SUV before buying one. Some people will be outraged when they hear about tire deflations happening, if they do anything they might purchase some type of locking device to go over their air valve. Others will have the idea of SUVs causing emissions reinforced in their mind.

                So if it actually is reducing purchases, I'd say it's a good propaganda campaign.

          • FRIENDLY_BUTTMUNCHER [she/her]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I read about it in "How to Blow up a Pipeline" by Andreas Malm. We had the book club in /c/literature cover it back in august. He specifically mentions efforts by tire deflators in Sweden, and looks at the rate of SUV purchase following their efforts in 2007 compared to other nations. The swedes bought significantly fewer.

    • Chred01 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It objectively reduces CO2 emissions. End of story.

      • Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Gonna need to hit a lot more than 600 SUV's to make a meaningful dent, and you won't get the numbers to do that if you can't get people on your side. This comes across to the majority of people like weird crank shit, and therefore actively harms the movement's ability to gain an effective mass.

        • Chred01 [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          gonna need to hit a lot more than 600 SUV’s

          Good thing they’ve done 9,000 and counting.

          And it’s not just putting them out of commission for a bit that causes the reduction, sales of SUVs in affected areas drop dramatically.

    • Chred01 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Which was last months book club recommendation on this very site and yet half the posts in here are talking about lib optics. Wtf is going on in here.

      :fedposting: Please stop inconveniencing the first world! That’s not how we do a climate action!

      • InternetLefty [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        A lot of people here are first worlders and accepting the validity of this method (however valid it is) requires some self criticism which frankly is not easy. I think we should be giving people levity as often as possible in situations like this. Most people will come around if you give them space to self crit.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I'm not sure anyone is questioning the validity of this -- "ban SUVs" would get nearly unanimous support here. People are questioning whether this is meaningful action or adventurist pranking.