Permanently Deleted

  • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Citations needed for it being anything else. And if you want to limit it to "human" then why not limit it to a specific class or race of human? Exploitation is exploitation. Suffering is suffering. If you aren't interested in the abolition of all of it, then I would contend you are not. a. leftist.

    • eduardog3000 [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And if you want to limit it to “human” then why not limit it to a specific class or race of human?

      Because the difference between humans and other animals is vastly greater than the difference between culturally made up classes and races of people?

      • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Now who needs their citations? :blob-no-thoughts:

        Doesn't matter though, who gives a shit about matters of "vastly greater" (as defined by who?) degree. Exploitation is exploitation and suffering is suffering. Period. Fucking nerd.

        • eduardog3000 [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          as defined by who?

          The uhh, taxonomic system? The fact that humans can produce offspring with each other but not other animals? The fact that humans are capable of intelligent communication and all but maybe the very smartest non-human animals (e.g. dolphins) aren't?

          Do you really want to say the difference between races is the same as the difference between humans and other animals? Because yikes.

          • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Oh, so it's a matter of taxonomy, then? Not the capacity for suffering? Hmmm.. seems to me there were some eugenicists that made similar arguments. Go figure.

            • eduardog3000 [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Do you really want to say the difference between races is the same as the difference between humans and other animals? Because yikes.

              • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Who says a distinction needs to be made? I guess since there is some difference between dogs and humans, that makes it ok to beat dogs to death they might taste good? Exceptional materialism there, comrade.

                • eduardog3000 [he/him]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Who says a distinction needs to be made?

                  The fact that distinctions exist for literally anything?

                  Also, humans and dogs co-evolved to be partners and companions.

                  • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    ok, then replaced dog with pig. Or Aardvark. The logic is unchanged. Jesus, I would have hoped that people who considered themselves "communists" would be better able to think this through.

        • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I would like to exploit some wind energy, some trees, some labor from myself and others, and on and on. I am an exploiter.

          • BringBackSerbMilf [none/use name]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Right, that's exactly what is meant by "exploitation" in Marxist theory. So smrt. Even if that were the case, our inability to separate out the use of things like wind and land from SENTIENT FUCKING BEINGS that feel pain and are capable of suffering is just testament to our inability to empathize with anything than isn't "like" you. That's a very typical liberal problem that you suffer from and you'd do well to do some self crit on it if you think of yourself as anything beond a larping leftist. Really, this is kindergarten-level discourse.

    • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      In a communist society I would hope we would be exploiting all kinds of things, or else I don't see the point.