https://nitter.1d4.us/IGN/status/1677399862973702154

https://twitter.com/IGN/status/1677399862973702154

Show

    • GnastyGnuts [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I'm not sure where it fits given that it's a "druid in bear form" and not an actual bear (and so would have human intelligence and capacity for consent), but reading that it sounds reminiscent of "it's not a child, it's a thousand year-old demon-dragon in child form", so...

      I don't play Baldur's Gate or any of that shit though, so I have no horse in this race I suppose.

      Also obligatory Kurt Angle: https://youtu.be/gv0LY9upBlE

      • somename [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, one is targeting a very vulnerable group of people in society, and Loli's and similar play into and encourage the urge for the people who might abuse them. In contrast, I don't think there's an epidemic of bear-fuckers really, so it just kind of feels different? To me at least?

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It's two consenting adult humans (or elves or whatever). Like full stop, no notes.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, and the "thousand year old loli" is a "consenting adult human" but it still simulates a paraphilia, just like the "bear but really a human" does.

          • Gay_Tomato [they/them, it/its]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Its more equivalent to an adult human turning temporarily into a child to get their freak on.

            In hindsight this conversation should probably stop. dead-dove-3

      • Awoo [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It would be the same as a Twilight werewolf surely?