Someone working in the federal government posted this in the SRA sub.

We need to make memes less accessible to feds.

  • ArmpitsForever [she/her]
    hexagon
    ·
    4 years ago

    I believe it was in regards to this: https://ncri.io/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-White-Paper-Network-Enabled-Anarchy-14-Sept-1049am.pdf

      • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Holy shit they are deep enough to know about 2_2_2. They're watching every single thing we say

          • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 years ago

            I participated in a struggle session about the morality of killing child hostages to stop a fascist genocide. Those post will definitely be in there lol

            • Helmic [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              under what possible circumstances would killing child hostages stop a fascist genocide. where the fuck did you get child hostages, much less why. that sounds like an extremely pointless struggle session.

              • Bread_In_Baltimore [he/him]
                ·
                4 years ago

                Someone brought up the Romanovs being executed including the kids and said something like "if you're okay with killing children to further your goals, I'll just sit the revolution out". Which is obviously intended to start a struggle session. We explained that the fash will slaughter us and our families wholesale without thinking about it and we need to be prepared in the event that RWDS show up to do whatever is necessary. They asked for a scenario where killing kids could ever be an act of self defense and people talked about a hypothetical where there were mass exterminations happening and hostages were taken (like fascists' families), and some killed if they didn't comply. It's honestly dumb as shit that the conversation ever even had to be started. It's entirely hypothetical, probably never going to happen and serves only to alienate people and make us look insane. The OP was trying to act like we were all deranged psychos who can't wait to go full Khmer Rouge.

          • buh [she/her]
            ·
            4 years ago

            I bet these libs don't even know about AcidMarxism

      • unperson [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The topic network of “cop” portrays terms like “extrajudicial,” “impunity,” “innocent,” “bystander,” and “unarmed” in the same context as “murder” and “kill”

        i see no problem with this

        The only conclusion they can take from that word cloud is that those evil anacho-socialist extremists want to extrajudicially murder and kill innocent unarmed bystander cops with impunity.

    • TransComrade69
      ·
      4 years ago

      UH WE ARE REFERENCED A FUCK TON IN THAT. LMFAO

      • buh [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        finally our efforts are recognized 😌 they even gave a shout out to chapotraphouse2_2_2

        the "virgin vote vs. chad insurrection" meme is in there lol

      • bewts [he/him,comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        We did it comrades!

        Edit: Do you think its possible the govt put pressure on Reddit to can us or was it all based on ad revenue.

      • Amorphous [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        hahaha 18 instances of the term "chapo"

        we're that much closer to trump and biden arguing about bernie bros, chapos, and tankies

        the best timeline

      • itsPina [he/him, she/her]M
        ·
        4 years ago

        I'm scaring libs! I'm gonna shoot ya mr fbi I got a 9mm Beretta aimed at your residence rn sir come at me

    • Fordo [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's kind of frustrating seeing our righteous indignation, which is rising naturally across the board in response to the actions of local, state, and federal governments, put right next to actual fundamentalist terrorists and the fucking boogaloo boys who do not have a coherent ideology beyond coded memes and larping with hope they eventually get to shoot people. Never a fair shake. Oh well.

      The question mark for "Cell-like terror attacks" is kind of funny though. Even they can't find an armed leftist organization that's actually done anything here in recent years.

      • ArmpitsForever [she/her]
        hexagon
        ·
        4 years ago

        The terrorism we promote is outrage at police kicking in a door and shooting sleeping people.

      • fuschiaRuler [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Seriously like, "their numbers are growing after our bff cops murder random people. We must put a stop to their growth before they try to stop us from murdering them"

      • Helmic [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        i bet they're talking about anarchists breaking into abandoned buildings to squat or some shit. they're referring to affinity groups doing extremely basic praxis. those are now terror cells.

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Page 16, whoever wrote that paper mistook calls to sack a police chief for sacking a police precinct, lol

      Guess you don't learn British vernacular in cop school