• Yllych [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe the radioactivity of the water is overblown, but this feels like "I will publicly smoke one cigarette to prove lung cancer is overblown"

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its probably overblown, but it's crazy to pretend this isn't a case of leaders going "we can handle an extra x cases of cancer per million in order to save $100"

      • Yllych [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I saw some people on here saying that the half life of tritium is such that if it were contained for 50 years then the radioactivity would be much less.

        not necessarily an easy task, but I refuse to believe humanity is incapable of doing it. If the Japanese government made serious moves towards that kind of solution I think you'd see a lot less animosity coming from their neighbouring countries.

        • RION [she/her]
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://hexbear.net/comment/3812997 apparently they forgot to take something into account and there's actually little to no difference

          • Yllych [any]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok I was wrong, the water thing is definitely way overblown

  • MorelaakIsBack [comrade/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    in hell, there is a room. it is reserved for barack, and now rahm. they will be served flint tap water and fukushima sashimi for every meal, with predictable results

    • salton@reddthat.com
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'd have different feelings if they decided to eat exclusively contaminated fish and flint tap water for a decade or two.

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      My reaction too. These monsters can never just do the right thing and [redact] themselves.

  • impiri@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    This makes sense. Any Fallout player knows that ghouls are healed by radiation

  • Rojo27 [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    So do we get to see the fisherman catch the fish take it to the restaurant, see the chef prepare it and the waiter take it to him?

  • Judge_Juche [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    People's reaction to dumping the water is way overblown, like Japan acutally did a pretty good job treating the water and all that is left in it is Tritium, which US and Canadian plants will routinely dump into rivers.

    Personally I think some of the reaction in Asia is becuase there hasen't been a reason for everyone to get mad at Japan in a while. Like no high profile denials of WWII crimes or the PM talking about resurrecting the Imperial Navy and reforming the Co-prosperity Sphere. But dumping the water has gotten people across Asia out into the streets denouncing Japan again, and you love to see people enjoying themselves.

    • SootyChimney [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don't think "US and Canada do it" is a very effective argument for something being safe or reasonable. The reality is - We don't know what the effects are, and we can't even be completely sure they're doing what they say they are in the first place. The radioactivity may be low, but the presence of manmade tritium may well cause issues we don't even realise, and as always we're playing a gamble that "this number low so it's probably safe maybe". And that is undeniably a gamble, even if a low-risk one.

  • Budwig_v_1337hoven [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    tbf, eating it now is safer than it will be for a while

    like, give those little bone melters a few years to move through the food-chain before you proudly eat the spicy tuna

  • SootyChimney [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is so upsettingly uncannily a Simpsons bit - Rich guy eats fish contaminated by radioactive nuclear plant waste water discharged into natural sources to prove it's safe?

    Show

  • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I'm pretty sure the release actually is safe, but it might not be, so I encourage Rahm to go through with this.

    • culpritus [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It's probably safer to do it sooner than later since bio-accumulation/amplification will likely take a few years to reach serious levels.

  • iridaniotter [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The anti-environmental protestors keep saying that if the waste is safe, why don't people eat it. And now that people are eating it, it's just a devil's milkshake. Should I pull out the Parenti quote?