fite me

The only good thing about it is the practical effects.

  • Lester_Peterson [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It was cool how a kids movie about ghost hunting managed to make the EPA the real bad guys

    • OgdenTO [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Its a sign of the times that they put a whole subplot making fun of giving blowjobs in the kids movie.

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      In all fairness it should fall under the jurisdiction of the Nuclear Regulatory Committee.

  • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    arguing about entertaiment media you consume is Lib Identiy , especially if its a stupid american movie , it shows your insular mindset ...

    Watch "BAHUBALI the Beginning" and "BAHUBALI the conclusion" and shut the fuck up about any other movie , especially if its an american movie ..

      • ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        In this allegory the water is american movies and the sexy lady is bahubali - "The Beginning " -- and also Bahubali "The conclusion " , Movie Magic

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0ce5AgLphM

        Edit: and you can be Bahubali - Strong ! - if you climb out !

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      arguing about entertaiment media you consume is Lib Identiy

      "Time For My Stories" podcast fans on suicide watch.

  • threshold [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ghostbusters the Theme is more artistic than anything in Ghostbusters the movie. (both a slight to the film and a commendation of the theme)

    EPA as bad guy is a fucking insane move, but it was 1984 so I believe it was hollywood regulation to hate regulations. Don't you guys know, companies will keep themselves in check in whacky but effective ways

    • Sabocat [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      That aint worth much considering the theme is just a ripped off Huey Lewis song.

      • threshold [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        They're both fucking good. I also think while it is a copy- I think there's enough changes to it to be a new thing. So I'm for it

    • threshold [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Also I audibly laughed just as much in 1984's Ghostbusters as I did in the 2016 Ghostbusters. Yet again, a commendation of 2016's film as much as a slight on 1984's film.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      EPA as bad guy is a fucking insane move, but it was 1984

      The Reagan Era EPA was a fucking joke and would have absolutely pulled the plug on a box full of ghost-monsters to Own The Leftist Academics.

  • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]
    ·
    3 years ago

    It's just, neoliberal economics: the movie, isn't it?

    To be entirely honest I can't remember much of ghost busters because of how bored I was the entire time.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Are you saying it's neoliberal from the angle of like "small business brazenly disregards environmental regulations because they're cool and the EPA are nerds"?

      • ItsPequod [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        It's the thesis of "any problem can be solved by private enterprise". If ghosts and stuff become such a problem that exterminators of sorts are required, and it's like super-dangerous tech and stuff... then why are 3 shlub professors in New York doing it on their own dime? Shouldn't that be like a public interest matter?

        • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, they're effectively petit bourgeois entrepreneurs making profit off a natural disaster. The video game (effectively Ghostbusters 3) makes some vague gestures at squaring that circle though. They've become contractors working for the city with a public insurance fund. The EPA guy from the first movie is their supervisor or something, but they still treat him like a nerd dork loser. I'm not sure if this was a conscious decision to make the Ghostbusters seem more publicly accountable, or if it's supposed to imply they gained more public trust, or maybe it's just a silly game play mechanic where you get a report of the dollar amount of destruction at the end of levels.

    • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      I always thought it was more of a dig at capitalist beaurocracy kinda like Brazil. The Ghostbusters are by no means the ideal solution to the ghost problem, but they're the solution that capitalism allows for.

      The EPA joke was always more of a "the government would rather try and apply standard beaurocratic procedures to this novel problem than mobilize a massive publicly funded response to it".

      Switch out ghosts with covid and it's actually surprisingly prescient about how the US government handles novel problems that effect the public health.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It’s just, neoliberal economics: the movie, isn’t it?

      Neoliberals famously using super-science to find and trap ectoplasmic entities, then fight a dark god.

      • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        No, but neoliberal economics does heavily rely on privatisation and removal of regulations, both of which are major themes of Ghost Busters. From the EPA guy being the main antagonist of the film, to the lack of any government assistance in busting ghosts. The main thesis of Ghost Busters is that small businesses should be allowed to do as they please without big government regulations restricting them.

        But of course movies don't have any subtext, ever.

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          3 years ago

          neoliberal economics does heavily rely on privatisation and removal of regulations, both of which are major themes of Ghost Busters

          Ghost Busters was built on the premise that people who didn't believe in ghosts were being asked to govern a ghost-catching business. It was, at the end of the day, a comedy. And its worth noting where they were playing up conflict for comedic effect and where they were actually expressing criticism of an institution.

          The main thesis of Ghost Busters is that small businesses should be allowed to do as they please without big government regulations restricting them.

          Didn't the Ghost Busters accidentally bring about the end of the world and demolish a big chunk of the city by summoning a massive State Puff Marshmallow Man?

  • MerryChristmas [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Pumpkinhead is my favorite when it comes to practical effects. Everyone should watch Pumpkinhead instead. It's about racism, class, swamp witches and vengeful spirits in the south.

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The cartoon is good, the movies are eh

    The cartoon has legitimately creepy ghost designs and lasted 50+ episodes before it started getting bad

    Damn Slimer

  • FidelCashflow [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The 2016 ghostbusters is the best one. The first is about metoo. The seccond is about casual sexual harassment. The tbird and beat shows how cool action scenes could be if you just gave women the same fight choreography as men.

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Ghostbusters is bad because the political viewpoint that it sort of implies if you look for it is in contradiction with mine. My dad worked for the EPA and when this movie came out he was beaten to death with a homemade proton pack by a man wearing a rubber Bill Murray mask. It's also solely responsible for Reagan getting a second term.

    It's a comedy about catching ghosts.