Not sure he understands the level of cringe here.
This is such a catastrophically bad take that I'm thinking he may have misread the tweet and didn't see the secretly part. Otherwise, wow wtf
I'm willing to interpret this 1 of 2 ways until further notice
- what you said
- that it's embarrassing that the US would even need such a law in the first place, bc US courts/judges are so illegitimate that they would ACTUALLY side in favor of the rapist unless explicitly forbidden via said law.
but probably 1. Although 2 is definitely true
What is it a reply to? I don't have an account and it won't let me see.
Oh, yeah, bad take there. You don't get to secretly do things during sex unless it's from a pre agreed upon list of surprises and surprises are considered cool and good by you partner.
adding Chen Weihua to the Victims of Chen Weihua Memorial Foundation list
Was hoping Chen would be 100% correct takes, 0% incorrect takes. Guess he'll at best beat Mao and Stalin's 70%/30% record smh
If he didn't misread that post than that's pretty fuckin bad. Like questionably problematic. But all your favs are already problematic sooo
He's a boomer lol most of his takes are light stuff and Facebook-tier. Reads like a confused boomer hot take.
