recent news https://www.google.com/search?q=carbon+priming+soil&tbm=nws
science: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=deep+soil+carbon+priming&btnG=
ignore the technocratic redditor grifting of tree planting, which has (as in all other cases of "carbon capture and storage" grift) not been shown to store carbon at the scale we need it, and ironically can release deep soil carbon stored after thousands of years of slow accumulation.
(also please post more about this extremely vital topic on /c/Science because those dorks banned me to protect the mental health of their nazi bureaucrat friends who are really depressed by their Malthusian jobs...ironic that their class smugly say "the Dark Age isn't real". I've literally never heard anyone else talking about this obscure research, and these orthodox redditors chose to excommunicate someone with an actual radical critique of their hegemonic neoliberalism. The neo-dork age is getting dorkier each day!)
i'm an ecologist with a strong background in soil carbon dynamics. i'm also a published scientific author with peer reviewed literature in carbon footprint analysis. planting trees is pretty much always cool and good, except in weird edge cases that reveal little but flawed experimental design and short term anomalies.
one doesn't need to go to the Le Playhead Academy for Good Boys with Science Brains to understand why this is. rather, look at deforestation as a function of human activity and then think, "we should probably reforest at least some of this space that we rapidly deforested to do a bunch of capitalism."
i am breeding a new species of tree that fires high explosive rounds at people who do not respect the lorax.
Hi! What labor could an ecologist do that would be commodifiable by capitalism?
Do ecological surveys so that a company can say they did their due dilligence.
Enforcing the muzzling of capitalist overconsumption? Pretty based tbh
If that system worked we wouldn't be in this situation. It seems like they do more positive than most jobs. DOTs and other infrastructure orgs use them a lot.
:farquaad-point: banned from c/science :farquaad-point:
we love our mods don't we folks
i guaran-fucking-tee they aren't banned for posting 'unpopular' science.
this poster gets the greatest leeway on this site and they cannot help forcing mods to ban them for rulebreaking posting
How tf you gonna post google searches instead of links to actual articles/papers? Wack
forreal lol I'm not thumbing through 35,400 results to find a paper that may or may not be related to whatever the fuck you're talking about
Pmc karen omc karl EPIC KAREN PMC JARNS PLC SK5 DJRMYRHEJSKS.COSMWOS DOE WITIDISNEJENALPQPPOPPO SJSKAOAPA 2 E £\¥○♤○♧ MMMMMMMMMMMMM YOOOOM ZOOM BARPOILEEE |♤`¥~ o [jzsmsowo99999oooo9 ?òndkalqp1o999i9 foods spmc kare pmckarenpmcjarenpmxks 3owowooo 2kwowowoqoo99999872. ♤\¥°■ lepoeppo amaos9w e999 AAAAGHHHHHH
Oh no oh shit they're ascending to the Black Mold realm.
They have abandoned this earthly plane for true enlightenment
Didn't know China planting trees to prevent desertification was "technocratic redditor grifting", you learn something new everyday huh?
Question: why is it only trees? Permaculture in a given ecosystem involves a really diverse set of species
Indeed "All you need is plant tree" is a PMC mind virus but there are better ways to make that argument. Say something about monoculture or economic incentives
The cure to forest fires in California is to plant as many eucalyptus trees
