Nah I have see enough radfems on the internet to know that there are at least a few who think like this.
Societies with a high ratio of Females to Males (temporary or permanent) have historically been super-great feminist utopias.
That's not what I'm going for. You see, places where war, infanticide, or other pressures forced the male population down have resulted in patriarchal hellworld harems due to easier control of reproduction.
Couldn't that be explained by associative factors though? IE the actual war/poverty that caused the male decrease in the first place?
Like in Russia there was a huge male deficit after WW2 and it seemed to work out pretty good for the next 3 decades.
And in India the northern states which favor male births are far more patriarchal than the southern states which have no sex preference.
Just for the record I'm not saying "male genocide good", just that a genocide administered via war/poverty would have completely different and probably worse effects than a genocide consisting of women consciously choosing to abort male babies.
So TERFs just believe the evil gene is stored in the Y chromosome yeah? Kind of like race science but for gender.
Remember the Valerie Solanas the woman who tried to assassinate Andy Warhol
Check out her SCUM manifesto
SCUM Manifesto is a radical feminist manifesto by Valerie Solanas, published in 1967.[1][2] It argues that men have ruined the world, and that it is up to women to fix it. To achieve this goal, it suggests the formation of SCUM, an organization dedicated to overthrowing society and eliminating the male sex. The Manifesto has often been described as a satire or parody, especially due to its parallels with Freud's theory of femininity.[3][4] It has been reprinted at least 100 times in English, translated into 13 languages, and excerpted several times.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
As a teenager, I fucking loved this thing. A messed up abused kid who hated most people, Valerie made sense to me as someone hurting as much as I was. Always had time and Empathy for her.
radical feminism has always meant genocide. it's in the name - trans exclusionary. unfortunately, we do exist, which is a real problem when your worldview depends on us not. sooner or later, you're going to have to use force to make that belief a reality.
They'd have a much easier time of this elimination of males if they'd just drop the TERF and help me pour this bimbofication formula into the water supply.
This, I can understand some aspects of radfem ideology, but hating Trans as a feminist is like hating Black people as a socialist
wiping out the human species is the raddest of radfem
they are very smart, very mentally stable people
wiping out the human species is the raddest of radfem
Don't worry, the will probably keep a small male population around as spem "donors".
wiping out the human species is....very smart, very mentally stable
this but unironically
Is this some weird form of "it's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism", but taken as an actual guide of what to do?
This has gotta be a really old one if it shows both the upvotes and downvotes on comments. Reddit hasn't done that since before I joined.
This looks more like ovarit to me. The new TERF hellhole since r/gendercritical was banned.
yea it was on ovarit I was bored lurking there, and found those comments.
