I don't know whether it's wrecker shit or just malevolent selfish ignorance driving most of it, but it's alarming to me how many jobs and how many workers are being declared "not real workers" or "entitled" or "aristocratic" lately, complete with smirking contempt for when those "not real workers" lose their jobs.

Most of the workers being snarked on lately aren't anywhere near rich, either. It seems to be driven by a treatbrained "I got mine" attitude mixed with a "you used to have yours" crabs-in-a-bucket mentality, and I hate it.

Solidarity means solidarity with workers. It's playing into both capitalist and nazbol hands to get divided into little self-interested bands and snarking when someone else's job that they need to survive is in danger.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I'm bookmarking that for the next time some chatbot treat defender sneers about how artists or teachers or writers or lawyers aren't doing real work. Thank you.

  • MitchFucko [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It's a case of discovering class politics without abandoning liberal morality. "Real worker" is a value judgement, not a class analysis.

    How much a person gets paid does heavily influence their material conditions and thus their revolutionary/reactionary potential, though. Especially with imperialism at its current heights, some workers in the imperial core countries will be so comfortable that their material interests will align more with the imperialists than the global proletariat. And capitalists' control of culture is so strong that even many workers whose material interests are more on the borderline may tend towards reaction.

    A comrade is a comrade regardless of how much they make, but there's a reason most people making 200k+ a year are ghouls.

    edited after your comment because it's late and I realized the way I worded it could have sounded accusatory.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I agree with most of your take. The line is blurry between worker and labor aristocrat/petite bourgeoisie, especially because people that make more money tend to have more expenses and live in areas where things cost more so they can be both privileged and somewhat precarious at the same time, but there is something of a border all the same.

      That said, some people like to scribble zigzagging lines that weren't there because they don't like teachers or think artists aren't doing real work or some shit like that.

      • MitchFucko [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        That said, some people like to scribble zigzagging lines that weren’t there because they don’t like teachers or think artists aren’t doing real work or some shit like that.

        Yeah that nonsense is hilarious at best and possibly a psyop lol

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      edited after your comment because it’s late and I realized the way I worded it could have sounded accusatory.

      Appreciated, but I'm glad I picked up the good faith argument.

  • nabana [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I appreciate this post a lot. To give people a little more concrete of a real example that isn't just a theoretical tech laborer somewhere we should be concerned about:

    I dropped out of college for mech/aero eng with absurdly good grades because I didn't want to build weapons for America. I still have all that debt. I still only have (real & relevant) work experience in the service industry. I've been basically starving since and one of the few industries I've found SOME work in (freelance, because permanent work was already hard to find) is about to be further destroyed and turned into a hellscape of capitalist exploitation (than it already is) likely making any progress I've made since dropping out reset or worse. My entire background before college was IT, but in another country. Nobody in America is spending the extra 5 minutes figuring out how/when to dial a different timezone to verify that shit, and that's half the reason I went to college after moving here in the first place. Instead my resume just goes in the bin because all I've got is a half decade of retail and shit nobody cares about.

    It's hard to see people cheer for how hard it will be to find a job in the industry you're actively trying to find work in because they're annoyed at redditors or whatever. I'm already trying to survive on eating my principles instead of food. I'm not talking like "Oh I'm sad I don't make 60k" I'm talking "I've been living below the poverty line for almost 3 years at this point and I don't know how much longer I can pull it off". When does it start to feel like I made the right choice?

    Don't get me wrong. I fucking hate the techbros and the cultists and the industry in general, but what should I do instead? One of you give me a job and then feel free to post at my expense all fucking day for all I care, but until then I think I win the moral grandstanding competition.

    I'm not trying to be hostile or anything, I just saw some of the posts and just scrolled on at first but I've felt shitty about it for a little bit and seeing this post made me feel like it was worth it to maybe add in why it's not so cut and dry.

    • meth_dragon [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      i've been there

      the average amount of failure you have to go through just to find a shitty 9-5 is brain-breaking without a network, so for the sake of your sanity, please just bum a latex template and start fabricating your entire fucking resume, even if it's just to get some return calls from recruiters.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hear you loud and clear and I am on your side. :solidarity:

  • meth_dragon [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    just wanted to say that despite being of the same class, proletarians are still capable of exploiting each other intentionally or not, and so there needs to be a serious campaign for internationalist consciousness among the core's (hwite) labor aristocracy so they don't fall into opportunism (again)

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    No. There is exactly ONE true worker on earth and it is I, the one true leftist

      • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, everything has to be serious at all times and we cannot find any humor in the absurdity of hell world. The last time I smiled was on August 19th, 1991. I wear a dirty ushanka at all times, do not shave, and only take cold sponge baths because hot running water is bourgeoisie decadence. Every day at exactly noon I have the same meal of an expired Maoist MRE I store in a pit covered in old issues of a revolutionary newspaper. I sleep in a bed made of flags from every failed revolution so that they are never forgotten. In the evenings I stare at a picture of vodka by candlelight, but I do not allow myself to drink because there is nothing to celebrate. Every local org has banned me after I attempted to split it by assassinating the leadership. There is no plumbing in my house I shit in a brass bucket with a picture of Gonzalo and Deng french kissing in the bottom of it. My house is actually an overturned T34 in an abandoned junkyard in Wisconsin. I have a single friend in this world and it is a tapeworm named Bordiga that I met after ingesting spoiled borscht on 9/11 in the ruins of building 7 (I blew it up after finding that a nominally leftist NGO inside of it wasn’t sufficiently anti-imperialist, the attacks on the world trade center were a perfect revolutionary moment for me to enact direct praxis against liberalism). My source of income is various MLM schemes in the former soviet bloc that have been running for so long no one remembers who I am, they just keep sending money. I have not paid taxes since McGovern lost the Democratic nomination for president and my faith in electoralism died more brutally than my childhood dog after it got into an entire jar of tylenol. I own 29 fully automatic rusted kalashnikovs and three crates of ammunition entirely incompatible with them or any other firearms I own. My double PHD in marxist economics and 18th century Swiss philosophy (required to understand Engels) sits over the fireplace of my home, my fireplace is a salvaged drum from a 1950s washing machine that was recalled for locking children inside of it. I chose that washing machine model on purpose because I am anti-natalist. During the latest BLM protests I firebombed a Nikes outlet in the middle of a peaceful candlelit vigil. William F Buckley and I wrote hatemail to one another for 47 years until my final letter gave him an aneurysm. The only water I drink is from puddles. George Lucas and I dropped acid together during an MKULTRA southern baptist summer camp and he went on to write the movie Willow about our time together. The best way to test whether an electrical wire is live is to drool on it and shrimp salad is racist. You can make an IED out of potassium and the instructions are online thanks to Timothy McVey, who was actually a committed antifascist communist slandered by the deep state as part of operation condor. Every time a liberal files a restraining order against me, I carve a mark into the wall. I am running out of walls. When Amerika finally collapses I will be ready to lead the revolution. I am very smart and people like being around me.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            hexagon
            ·
            2 years ago

            From the comments:

            That game fantastically potrays a completely destroyed and delusional human in the Deserter character. True definition of insanity

            :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB: :LIB:

            • Tachanka [comrade/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              to be fair, the deserter is destroyed and delusional, not because of his communist past, but because

              spoiler

              he's a senile misanthrope and misogynist who snipes at people from his island while he rages to himself about how he should have died with his comrades. also he's been exposed to the neurotoxins of a giant insect called the insulindian phasmid.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]
                hexagon
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I agree, but if that's all the comment maker picked up from the character and his situation, dismissing everything he said, everything he had seen because of his own personal faults and especially because of the "lol mental illness therefore invalid" card, I call :LIB:

                It's just like that one edgy wrecker asshole here on Hexbear that said that Mark Fisher's entire body of work is invalid because he killed himself and even said that because of that that meant that everything he said was suspect and liable to make people suicidal because "lol mental illness amirite?," THEN later claimed "it was just a joke brooooooooo" literally days later after maintaining the not-joking position for all the time until then with multiple people arguing with them.

                  • UlyssesT [he/him]
                    hexagon
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Nah, it's all good. You're right about how you described that character, and I don't particularly like him myself, but that was all the takeaway I saw from the comment in that video link.

  • MoreAmphibians [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some workers have a class interests so opposed to other workers that it doesn't make sense to put them in the same class. Cops and writers for The Atlantic are two examples.

    • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      One of the many distinctions between "worker" and "not a worker" is when your sole purpose is to oppress workers and protect the ruling class. Cops under capitalism are not workers.

    • ElmLion [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      ??? Both cops and said writers, though fighting for the stupid side, have very definite interests shared with all workers, they have nothing to lose but their chains and everything to gain from common ownership over the means of production. Fighting for the wrong side does not invalidate you for the label of prole.

      • Nakoichi [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        have very definite interests shared with all workers

        Not sure about this. Both of their occupations require them to be opposed to the interests of the greater working public.

        • ElmLion [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It is very much possible to fight against your own best interests.

    • xXthrowawayXx [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      not respecting someone is different than not considering them workers.

      also if there is no ethical consumption under capitalism there cant be ethical production under capitalism either. why does it matter what volume or type of suffering your particular lever in the pain machine causes and to whom? the point is that we literally can't do anything inside of the system that's free of its sins.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        I contend that less suffering is still preferable if no suffering is not an option yet. Same deal with consumption; I'd rather ride a bike than roll coal, given the choice.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You make a fair argument and I find myself agreeing with some of it. I suppose the line I have to straddle that qualifier I put about "has to work to survive" to maintain my position.

      Except for people with tiny podcasts with a few dozen followers at most, the entire "influencer" thing is dreadfully parasitic the way I see it. People pay money for a fake social bond with someone who is more often than not a petty malignant narcissist having ego clashes with other petty malignant narcissists where the followers of both clash like peasant levees representing each brand. Such "influencers" are in no real danger and lack economic precarity when they reach the big time.

      A lot of working-class work does hurt other people but ultimately it's a hard line to draw. The guy driving the bulldozer destroying the Joads' house in Grapes of Wrath needed the money, as did the guy who would drive the bulldozer next if the first driver was shot and killed.

      • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        as did the guy who would drive the bulldozer next if the first driver was shot and killed.

        Embracing the capitalist rationalization that it’s fine to do shitty evil things because if you don’t someone else will takes us down a pretty dark road.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          I didn't embrace it. I said it's a mess and it sucks.

    • ElmLion [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I'd love to agree, but how? To be honest, I don't think there's a single job I could do that isn't meaningfully supporting exploitative systems.

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • LiberalSocialist [any,they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          That becomes a question of propaganda then, tbh. Media/culture convinces the middle class they're more like the upper than the working class. But the middle class is an illusion. If you need to work or you die, then you're a worker. So, the job becomes convincing the so-called middle class that their interests align with the rest of the workers, which is no different from convincing the rest of the working class that their interests align with other workers, that is, class consciousness.

          • solaranus
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • LiberalSocialist [any,they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Stock Market itself is a form of propaganda. The average techbro owns nowhere near enough to live off of it (i.e. like the bourgeois) but it serves as a permanent source of anxiety, keeping them chained to the forces of the market and the stability of the capitalist system. The only people who actually become rich off of it are those who own enough to influence it, i.e. the people who're already bourgeois. This is why crypto shit became so big - knowingly or not, people realized that kind of explosive, exponential return was the only way to actually become rich. And, of course, it is now used by the already rich to exploit everyone else.

              Your reasoning also applies to the what you consider "real" workers in the West, who themselves benefit from the exploitation of the global south. I've heard it before, the argument is that somehow the latter will rise up against the capitalist-imperialist system and bring about socialism. So that is who we all should be focusing on and that workers in the West are just the "labor aristocracy" i.e. useless in the struggle and might even be opposed to it.

              That way, I'm sorry to say, will never lead to socialism. We, who live in the heart of the empire, are equally needed to bring about socialism. We, the workers in the west, must oppose our capitalists who oppress both us and the people in the global south. It is only by this combined effort of all workers all over the world, the imperial core and the global south, that socialism will emerge.

              I'll go a step further. I think this entire argument is just lazy, defeatist ideology meant to create an excuse by Westerners to not do shit to bring socialism, and sit on their ass and hope that brown and black folk do the job for them.

              I've had this discussion here in the past. People here, when you press them, admit they don't even believe socialism is possible in Amerika or the west. It will just be fascism and the only thing they can do is support themselves and their loved ones. It's just so fucking lazy and defeatist.

              • solaranus
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

              • meth_dragon [none/use name]
                ·
                2 years ago

                i don't think anyone is supportive of defeatism here, it's more of a post hoc justification of the metropolitan proletariat's historical betrayals of their long term class interests in favor of their more immediate material interests

            • meth_dragon [none/use name]
              ·
              2 years ago

              adding to this, aesthetics will only defeat material conditions if the contradictions of capital are sufficiently blunted

              the entire point of imperialist, 'divide and conquer' constructs such as racism is to create an illusionary gradient of proximity to capital in order to funnel mainstream demographics towards its defense in the form of reaction

              barring an utter breakdown of the capitalist state apparatus, only the most marginalized groups of the core will be able to develop class consciousness of their own accord

        • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          the lifeboat is shrinking, and the middle class is simply at the middle of the lifeboat

          it convinces itself that it is on the same yacht as that rich guy over there

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            hexagon
            ·
            2 years ago

            Some of them hope that if they shove enough poors out of the lifeboat, the yacht might lower a ladder to them.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          There is a reason that the heart of fascism lies in the middle class.

          The affluent and well-off having a "I got mine" attitude has long been part of the culture that allowed atrocities since at least the colonial era where imports from plundered lands to the imperial core(s) costed the lives of millions over time. :grillman:

        • pooh [she/her, any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          They are far closer to being homeless than they are to being a billionaire or even millionaire and this is more true in areas where CoL eats up the extra income. Some might realize this, some might not, but it definitely is in their interest to side with workers against the capitalist class.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      as a minimum wage worker who delivers them food

      I've seen some radioactive takes here, and one of them was that the food deliverer "isn't a real worker" if they are paid per gig instead of having a steady wage.

      Nazbol propaganda is a fuck.

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          I felt just as pissed off when I read the smug :downbear: take that gig workers aren't technically proletarians in some gatekeepy ironically elitist sense.

    • ElmLion [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      As someone who knows a fair few people making 100k+, I guarantee you they are just as afraid of losing all their money and being fucked over and left in the gutter. The shared interests are a fairer way of living that makes better value judgements and doesn't threaten to throw you in the swamp the second you stop being useful to the bourgeoise.

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • ElmLion [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I'm not saying the 15k person isn't closer to the gutter, just that the fear is still there.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      There's some blurry lines, but if someone needs to work to survive and their survival is threatened if they stop working or lose that work, I consider them a worker.

      With some notable exceptions, such as the mercenary men-at-arms that exist to secure the lucre and private empires of the ruling class. :the-pigs:

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      There are some blurry lines when we get into more PMC jobs but ultimately yes. At the end of the day the well-paid engineer has the same class interest as the precarious service worker. PMC's are way closer to becoming destitute than to become billionaires. All it takes is an illness or "the economy" having a hiccup.

      However, despite having a class interest in controlling their own labour, many PMC's are reactionary dipshits who sides with the oligarchs. This form of false consciousness is useful to the bourgeoisie as it makes workers in key positions of the economy loyal to them. However, what they feel like our what they vote for doesn't change their material relationship to the means of production.

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          wouldn't that apply to the industrial workers of the past who were able to buy houses and live middle classes lives and retire as well? Before 401ks pensions were a lot more prevalent

  • Owl [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The amount of anti-tech worker vitriol on this site lately has been making me stop by a lot less.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Tech workers are workers.

      That said, I feel the same way as you do when some smug gatekeeper tells me that gig workers, or artists, or teachers, or journalists, or lawyers, or anything else that isn't STEM (or TE specific) or wearing a hard hat is "not real work."

    • old_goat [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a tech worker. . . fuck tech workers. Easiest job in the fucking world gatekept behind leetcode hard challenges. Anyone who plays along with that hiring process is a class traitor.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Those employees often have no difficulty getting rehired somewhere else at this point and their skill sets are in high demand and are paid highly. The line is somewhat blurry but knowing a few tech workers in my own family, if they stopped working tomorrow and refused to work for months, maybe years, they'd still have a place to live and food to eat and money left to dwindle down if they so chose.

      What I mean to say is their survival is not nearly as imperiled if they stop working or are removed from a job.

      Now, the coerced employment pressures on Twitter's mostly-immigrant-labor workers and the apparent bootlicking from those workers, well I don't know what to say about that.

    • crime [she/her, any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I have honestly only met 2 people like that at most in my 10+ years of experience in software engineering

      Most tech workers I've known have been fairly normal 9-5 workers, not rise-and-grind cultists, not musk huffers, not whatever. Even the ones that leaned bazinga-brained were pretty non-loyal to their jobs/companies and were ready to jump ship for a boost in compensation or worked on their side hustles on the clock

      • GrafZahl [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Aren't the cultists mostly the econ/business types who like tech and work in tech but don't understand it? I think the entire start-up culture in germany is based around that.

        • crime [she/her, any]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Probably, fortunately for me I'm pretty insulated from that.

          But people have the misconception that technical workers are like that because software engineers tend to be highly paid. They can have brainworms on account of their material conditions (and often do, I haven't had much luck trying to find people willing to unionize) but they're rarely full bazinga brains in my experience

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Your reply gives me hope that there are more tech workers that aren't completely bazinga brained than I originally thought. Where I am, the bazinga density is too damn high.

        Teslas. Teslas everywhere. :so-true:

        • crime [she/her, any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I've met a few people who are minimally-brainwormed about having teslas too, believe it or not . mostly well meaning climate libs with too much money, but at least it's just a car to them

          But yeah after hitting their mid-late 20s most everyone I've known in tech gets pretty normal and even sometimes lean based.

          I worked with this one guy for a few years who was a total stereotypical g*mer and overall had extremely Kyle energy, wound up being surprisingly based the more we talked, to the point where we'd yes-and each other's communist shit in meetings in front of our boss before she could catch up enough to change the topic lol. A couple other former coworkers have been anarchists, a couple more MLs, and an old FOSS greybeard I worked with was a trot. It's not the norm, but it's not unheard of either

          In my experience there are fewer bazinga than you'd think, and more comrades than you'd think too. The people with the worst opinions are just the terminally online ones, and we make fun of them on the clock

  • BigAssBlueBug [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yea sure I agree. But I will still hate stemlords and techbros on a deeply intimate level while I fight for their rights

    • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I will fight for everyone regardless of education to have the same level of material access as STEMlords and techbros currently do, so that they have one less thing to be smug losers about.