Anything goes, give me your wackiest predictions and theories

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is in many places, just not everywhere. Appalachia, Puerto Rico, lots of small towns, lots of urban neighborhoods. There was some guy saying, he say his country collapse, and it didn't happen all at once. i think something about, one day there'd be a bombing, and the next day you'd go to the disco, and it just happened a little at a time so there was no big dramatic moment.

    • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      10 months ago

      that sounds like it was from this:

      I Lived Through Collapse. America Is Already There
      Living in Sri Lanka during the end of the civil war, I saw how life goes on, surrounded by death
      https://gen.medium.com/i-lived-through-collapse-america-is-already-there-ba1e4b54c5fc

      • BeamBrain [he/him]
        ·
        10 months ago

        The numbing litany of bad news. The ever rising outrages. People suffering, dying, and protesting all around you, while you think about dinner.

        It's only in hindsight that I realize just how well Children Of Men nailed this.

      • TimeTravel_0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Non paywall link

        https://archive.is/Ss3FH

    • BeamBrain [he/him]
      ·
      10 months ago

      As the saying goes: collapse isn't an event, it's a process.

  • LeylaLove [she/her, love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I think the US is already in decline, but I'm seriously concerned about the depression wave taking over our schools. I expect shit to pop off around 2030 when most of the COVID school kids graduate. We're going to see a lot more people who do not value their own lives acting out. I don't expect any overthrow of the American government, but I expect there to be a lot of civilian skirmishes.

    • supafuzz [comrade/them]
      ·
      10 months ago

      mass ptsd + hopelessness + guns - theory = real bad time, and not in a cool revolutionary way

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    10 months ago

    you will be posting from a crater that used to be Chicago during the 18th Great Lakes Clique--Missouri Government War and some asshole on hexbear is going to be moaning about 'why hasn't the US collapsed yet'

    • CyborgMarx [any, any]
      hexagon
      ·
      10 months ago

      In twenty years when my crew and I are wandering around in a liberated Abrams tank preparing for the great offensive against the Iron Fortress of the Dakota Wastes, I'll still be on Hexbear laughing at owl memes rat-salute

  • sexywheat [none/use name]
    ·
    10 months ago

    As others have pointed out here, collapse is a process, not an event. But that being said, I think that if Trump gets reelected (which is almost inevitable at this point) his aggressive deportation plan might very well be a huge catalyst for inter-state conflict within USA:

    Stephen Miller, Trump’s top immigration adviser, has publicly declared that they would pursue such an enormous effort partly by creating a private red-state army under the president’s command. Miller says a reelected Trump intends to requisition National Guard troops from sympathetic Republican-controlled states and then deploy them into Democratic-run states whose governors refuse to cooperate with their deportation drive.

    Not to mention deporting as many people as he plans to would take a wrecking ball to the American economy.

    • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      10 months ago

      creating a private red-state army

      what-the-hell

      Christofascist paramilitaries that forcibly deport, kill or otherwise incacerate people of a certain group? I bet the libs will just put up their hands and go "if we oppose them we're just as bad as them"

      • sexywheat [none/use name]
        ·
        10 months ago

        They're straight up planning to make concentration camps for immigrants. I mean, those basically exist already at ICE detention facilities, but this would be a huge expansion of that.

        Dominionist paramilitaries immediately remind of the (harrowing) It Could Happen Here podcast.

          • HexbearGPT [comrade/them]
            ·
            10 months ago

            They’ll negotiate slightly softer pillows for the immigrants in the concentration camps.

        • Justice@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          10 months ago

          Not trying to "start shit" but several people who run/work for that pod are actively antagonistic towards what they call "tankies." They often participate in borderline or straight up historical revisionism to paint communism as "not the Nazis, but not much better!"

          People accuse the main guy of being a fed. I don't know. Everyone calls everyone a fed in leftist circles, but he does have a bit of an odd past with things like "war journalism" which is always sus to me.

          Anyway, some of their episodes are good, and I'm certainly not the type to moralize media consumption. It just doesn't matter in the grand scheme. It really doesn't. Just hope people take stuff said on there and its sibling podcasts with a grain of salt. Especially regarding communist history like the USSR, Communist China, etc. Remember that the people delivering the info have a bias, as we all do. Theirs is pretty outwardly anti-statist, anti-centralization. You can see how that clashes with communism.

          I also recall at some point people there shitting on Marxist theories which I just laughed at. Maybe it was a joke, I don't remember the full context, but modern anarkiddies shitting on Marx would make me laugh, serious or not.

          • sexywheat [none/use name]
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah I was mostly referring to the first 10 or so episodes when it first started when it painted a picture of what the 2nd American Civil War might look like, I haven't much listened to the more recent stuff that they have done.

            And yeah I've also heard rumours of Evans being a fed. Apparently there was an instance where he interviewed a bunch of protesters (I think it was the ongoing Stop Cop City protest but I could be wrong) on video, and then shortly after that they all ended up behind bars like the next day. Also could have just been a total coincidence and they were likely going to be arrested anyway, who's to know.

    • tactical_trans_karen [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      10 months ago

      These freaks couldn't organize breaking out of a wet paper bag. A handful of people start to shoot back and they'll run away pissing themselves. BUT, the conflict and breach of the civil order will probably lead to further fractures.

  • wall_inhabiter@lemdro.id
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is an interesting question, at what point will the sporadic pointless violence and the constant desperation violence and the disease and the breakdown of public schools and loss of already minimal and difficult-to-access social services and the mass incarceration and disintegrating healthcare system where you stay in tbe ER for multiple days to go into debt and the high prices and the shit working conditions and the unlivable rent and the direct biological abuses of the powerless and the loss of any semblance of a social situation people know how to cope with while reassuring themselves they still have their Individuality™️ or a chance at a life instead of only surviving passes the point of no return into what you'd call collapse conditions. This already feels like the collapse. This is WWIII. That's why I feel alright. I've felt like this since I was 12 years old. I don't even care about what happens here and I don't feel guilty about it anymore, so ultimately I am one with the cool cyberpunk future and this is rad as hell actually

  • PKMKII [none/use name]
    ·
    10 months ago

    As far as causes, I don’t think the current Team Red/Team Blue partisan bickering will have anything to do with the collapse. That bickering is just theater to keep the vote narrative going. It inspires the occasional random actor to go adventurism mode but nothing organized on the level to get real collapse/balkanization.

    I firmly believe it’s going to be the supply chain of treats getting compromised that will trigger the collapse. It’s the only collective national glue, and the combination of climate change reducing productivity in the equatorial third world, the shortage of oil resources with no real transition plan to renewables, international shipping capacity insecurity due to prices, resources, piracy, other countries like China positioning to adapt to that new normal more smoothly, there ain’t gonna be enough treats to go around. That’s going to mean some states/regions attempting to hoard, ports will become points of resource distribution contention, whomever loses out on the federal fight will have motivation to split/rebel/attack opposing states, and we’ve got collapse/balkanization on our hands.

    Timewise, thinking somewhere in the 2040-2050 range. There’s enough buffer right now but that’s the range where a lot of the “shit hits the fan” climate points hit and that’s when the equatorial supply chain will be crippled.

  • Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Well, if we're going by the timeline of my satirical short story I wrote a few years back, I think I'd landed on the late 2020s. So, around the same time as the beginning of the Second Russian Civil War, the establishment of the Transgender Republic of Hibaristan, Chinese reunification, the establishment of the Ryukyu People's Republic, the reunification of Korea, and I think Greenland also declared independence around that time.

    Edit: oh and also Palestinian and Irish reunification, but I neglected to mention those.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]
    hexagon
    ·
    10 months ago

    My prediction is the mid 2040s, because in terms of historical narrative it's pleasingly symmetrical

  • keepcarrot [she/her]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Looking at how other empires have "collapsed" without being invaded or the military dividing up and declaring fiefdoms, it's been a slow decay of less and less effective centralisation (while still having de jure centralisation) as powerful people and organisations in regions increasingly view other regions as separate.

    I think the US military is too organisationally coherent for an Alexander the Great kind of situation. While people do get attached to their commanding officers, it's not nearly as close to the heroic classical period, and you get used to new commanding officers pretty quickly assuming they're not complete assholes. We do make jokes about how wonky/privately captured US Military procurement and logistics can be, but this hasn't translated into factionalism per se, just bloat. I am also willing to be proven wrong on this, especially if the funding dries up or the US Military suffers some major losses. I feel like things like Iraq and Afghanistan, the losses there were lower than the defending population and the type of warfare allows the command structure an easy "out" for its self-confidence.

    I also don't think the US will get territorially invaded. Naval landings suck at the best of times, and it's surrounded by allies, bases, and intelligence assets. No sane military is going to make that jump. Inasmuch as we valorise guerillas here, they're only good at defence where there is support amongst the local population. Again, open to see this changing, but I don't see it for the foreseeable future.

    I also don't see the US Military (as in... The DoD, pentagon, Army, Navy, etc) being divided up territorially. For instance, a portion of the army becomes "The Texas Border Defence Army". There are a lot of political motivations to keep this the case.

    Things like the national guard, police, and other "military"-like forces I definitely do see becoming more separated. Not necessarily with the "border crisis", but you can see the outline of it with the Texas National Guard. If cops get brought in from out of state as well, which states do this and which don't will also define these blocks. We're also partly seeing the outline with abortion laws. Whether or not these issues become "states rights" things, or if new issues are brought in (e.g. banning trans affirming care across all states instead) are all issues that you'll see further diversification but also weakening of federalism. If, say, a future Republican fed tries to ban trans affirming care and Washington State decides not to follow through, what happens? If DC stops funding to Washington State (I should have chosen different examples), the idea of federalism is weakened. If the law just isn't followed and local state government doesn't comply with the FBI, what happens? Do doctors in Seattle stop being able to practice elsewhere in the US? Does DC send in the troops to reign in the Washington state?

    The world will look very different with Texadollars and Californibucks, I think that's a long way down the road. But separated economies and laws which both still sort of use the US dollar (e.g. Seattle would import a lot of USD through corporations, say) is part of the beginning.

    Remember that with the Roman Empire, the Catholic Church and Feudal lords carried on many of the legal structures even after the Roman Empire stopped being able to be said to be a single entity. Systems of debt peonage carried over, the division between "arable land owning military citizen" and "slave/debt peon/non-citizen" carried over to "lord" and "peasant". The Catholic Church maintained Imperial divinity even though it was now a pope instead of an Emperor. Not with the exact same things, but that's what I imagine US Empire will look like in a few hundred years.

    This, of course, is alongside the tightening of Capitalist contradictions. Rich get richer even as profits get squeezed (until mono-oligopolies spread around the world), poor get poorer and more numerous and desperate. But the legal and nationalist concept of "The United States of America" I think will look like the above. Also, the US Military and intelligence apparatuses will continue to defend Capital since that's why they exist.

    • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      but that's what I imagine US Empire will look like in a few hundred years.

      I can never take anyone seriously who talks about any of the current geopolitical entities still existing in "hundreds" of years, let alone the already-in-early-collapse US empire specifically. As others have said, collapse is (more often than not) a process, but that process can happen extremely rapidly if the medium it exists in allows for it or even demands it. That medium is global society and it is a vastly different kind of entity now than it was a century ago, even more different than it was before the industrial revolution, and barely comparable to it was around the time the Roman Empire that often erroneously gets used as a metric of comparison. Sometimes people like to refer to how it took more than a century for it, or some of a number of older empires to fall, but they aren't accounting for how different the material conditions are now, such as the conditions that allow for information to travel instantaneously to opposite ends of the globe (to name one obvious example) and how significantly these differences inevitably increase the rate of societal and political change.

      The rates of technological, social, and environmental change are all increasing, and not just as a linear increase, it's exponential. By the turn of the next century the world will be entirely unrecognizable from what it is today. Climate change alone will ensure that, with mass migrations (and die-offs) happening on a scale humanity has never seen. That much is unavoidable. It's insane to think the US will still exist in a few hundred years. The face of the planet even, in terms of the biosphere, will be completely different as a result of the ecological collapse wrought by climate change, and some people here think the current unstable political entities will survive that? It never ceases to surprise me when communists, ostensibly with an understanding of historical materialism, fail to get this.

      edit: I don't mean to go off on you in particular, keepcarrot, I generally really like your comments. This is just something that bugs me when I see it come up here, in part because it makes me feel like even my fellow comrades don't understand how dire things are now in a way that they weren't in the past and on a scale that wasn't even registered in the past.

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah, it's ok. It's the way I see it, but I'm not married to it or anything.

  • quarrk [he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lenin:

    “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.”

    Marx:

    “Mankind thus inevitably sets itself only such tasks as it is able to solve, since closer examination will always show that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or at least in the course of formation.”

    Evolution of society happens like evolution of species. Nothing happens for a long time, until suddenly something does happen. Only one thing is certain, that change doesn’t happen until and unless the conditions are ripe for change. But the conditions do not in themselves precipitate change, they are only a precondition.

    The difficult thing is that one can argue the conditions for a total collapse in the US are already here, and that all is needed is the spark. But it could also be that we are missing some essential condition, like maybe the US Dollar has to be dismantled from international trade, or the US has to lose its access to nukes. We can’t know, we can only interpret events in hindsight, even with our dialectics and our science.

  • Greenleaf [he/him]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Another vote for "things will just get shittier over time", not total collapse at any point, except for one possible scenario (I will describe below). If we use the Roman Empire as template, they never really "collapsed" all at once. Britain experienced "collapse" when the legions left in the 4th century, but the Roman area around Constantinople did "collapse" until over 1,000 years later. It's common among Roman historians to not even talk about "collapse" much per se, and focus more on evolution and change. Heck, some parts of the empire actually saw conditions improve after Roman control ended (in North Africa, they could stop sending all their grain to Rome every year, for example).

    Now, there is one scenario I could see that could cause a total rapid collapse: if the US could no longer extract value (i.e. exploit) from the global south. I'm on a Capital vol. 2 and MMT kick right now. Basically, the key insight IMO from the first 17 chapters is that it's only in the sphere of production that value is created. It can be the production of goods or services, but that is the only place where value is created (well, Marx gives some very narrow examples of value being created in transportation of good and sometimes in storage, but those are extensions of production, really). This is where the fact that Americans don't make anything really comes back to bite them in the ass. Obviously we don't make things here but what most people don't realize is even American companies like Apple and Nike don't actually "create" value. The subcontractors they use in place like China and Bangladesh is where the value is created. It's just that Apple and Nike appropriate the value from those places and distribute it here among their marketers, lawyers, etc. The entire non-financial sector of the US economy resembles a merchant capitalist (where no value is created, it's just taken out of productive capital which is all overseas) economy than anything else.

    So what does this mean? If Americans aren't creating value within the country, and it's just that value is taken from other parts of the world and distributed here... if you cut that off then all of the sudden the US is a country that isn't creating much value and isn't even capable of that outside of a Stalin-esque centrally planned industrialization program. The US depends on circulating capital taken from the global south domestically, not producing it domestically. So if that's not circulating, and Americans have no real capacity to create value domestically... then material conditions probably degrade on a scale that's hard to even wrap your head around. THAT would be a hard and fast collapse.

    Admittedly, the catalyst for that (the rest of the world preventing the US from exploiting production in the rest of the world) is pretty far-fetched, so at this point it's just academic and why I saw that I really only see a slow motion degradation happening.

  • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Late 2030's- mid 2040's depending on how things pan out over the rest of the decade. There is no avoiding it, but if the neo-libs remain in power they may delay the collapse slightly. Climate change will be the predominant factor in the collapse. A one-two punch of a collapse of insurance and housing markets due to the increase in extreme weather events, and the rise In sea levels tanking coastal economies. Add in food insecurity for some additional civil unrest. Starvation, disease, and violence will be the leading causes of a death-toll that will rise to at least several dozen million in a short period.

    The federal government may remain nominally in power in parts of the former United States, but will be a toothless puppet of the corporations that weather the collapse (even more-so then it is now). Rural areas that lack any sort of resources that corps desire will become lawless violent wastelands, the only order coming from petty warlords, mostly the remnants of far right militias or criminal organizations that fled the inhospitable global south. Many communities will be migratory as extreme weather makes it difficult to put down roots. Famine will be rampant and cannibalism will become common.

    Survivalist and Preppers across the nation will rejoice thinking their day has come, only to find that their choice of location for their compound/bunker was extremely poor. Floods will wash many of them away, and many more will be scorched to the ground by uncontrolled massive wildfires. The rest will be juicy targets for more organized gangs of looters. Many will think themselves smart by heading into the wilderness to survive off the land, only to find several million others had the same idea. They mostly end up shooting each other, and wild game is over-hunted to extinction within 2 years.

    Cities across the US may weather the collapse to varying degrees. It mostly depends on their current wealth and location. Those that persist will transition into semi-autonomous neo-feudal corporate police states. The majority of these will be based around the Great Lakes and in the Rocky Mountains. Denver and Salt Lake City will likely survive, with the Mormons turning post-collapse Utah into their theocratic wet dream. Chicago will be the center of a loose alliance of corpo city states around the Great Lakes, and rust belt cities like Detroit, Cleveland, and Buffalo will finally have their comeback! The southwest will be completely uninhabitable due to drought and extreme heat. The west coast and southeast are too prone to extreme weather for population centers to survive. There will be a great migration as hundreds of millions become climate refugees. The scarcity of food will make it so the inhabitable parts of the former US will likely only take in refugees with connections or useful skills. Many will be enslaved. Others will be turned away to starve or die violently in the wasteland.

    Technology levels will decline as the global supply chains that make modern tech possible collapse. Quality of life as a whole will decline greatly for all even the elites. The elites with more foresight will prepare and relocate, becoming the new feudal lords. Those who do not will find themselves meeting the same fates as the lower classes, their former wealth worthless and lacking the skills to survive. The middle class will be finally obliterated completely, and chattel slavery will make its big comeback! The plus side is there may be some isolated and heavily armed rural communities where life is alright, but none of this will last as the climate collapse continues to worsen triggering feedback loops that will raise global temperatures more then 6 degrees. Too hot for any currently evolved complex life to inhabit the earths service. Humans are extinct by the turn of the next century. GG everybody!

    *Edited this to clarify some language and add new ideas.

  • asg101 [none/use name, comrade/them]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Collapse is already happening for way too many, it will accelerate when no one on either coast can get property insurance due to rising sea levels, when the inland aquifers are finally sucked dry and agricultural irrigation ends, and when no more able-bodied children are available as cannon fodder for the empire. Probably the last straw will be when the never-ended civil war goes hot once again. We just need to hope they don't use nukes on each other this time.