• north [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    It is silly to compare Voice of America (an excellent journalistic institution with a great reputation), to the Washington Post (overall pretty good), to Russia Times (literal state propaganda).

    Lol lmao

    • egg1918 [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also that’s a laughable and total misunderstanding of Voice of America’s history, mission, and goals. It has a reputation basically everywhere as being as close to objective and reliable reporting as you can get outside the BBC.

      I'm speechless

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Most propagandized people in the world.

        That they can look at the BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION and fail to recognize it for what it is says so much about Westian thinking.

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • Teekeeus
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            deleted by creator

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Also just, like, the well-documented history of having a rightwing bias while Tories complain about it having a leftwing bias and pressure it further to the right.

        • Fuckass
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • WoofWoof91 [comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It has a reputation basically everywhere as being as close to objective and reliable reporting as you can get

        data-laughing

        100 quid this dipshit's a yankee lmao

    • CannotSleep420
      ·
      2 years ago

      They can't even get Russia Today's name right.

  • pooh [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    VOA is funded by the US Agency for Global Media. It’s literally the official propaganda arm of the US government. It’s completely delusional to think that VOA (or RFA, RFE, etc.) is “independent journalism” in any way shape or form.

    • WayeeCool [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Not "funded by" the US Agency for Global Media but is literally a division of the US Agency. VOA is literally headquartered out of a federal building in Washington DC. Unlike public broadcasters, it isn't a situation of a non-profit that "receives public money", "has public charter", or even "NGO that receives grant money" but that it is literally a federal agency with the mission of influencing foreign audiences to advance US geopolitical interests.

      • pooh [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re right, and maybe it was a bad choice of words on my part.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They could call it The US Deptartment for Propaganda & Foreign Manipulation and these people would still would still argue the point. They're not even engaging with reality, just a my team good rationale that they've internalised and gets more absurd by necessity the more it's exposed to contrary evidence. They're the secular, liberal version of the evangelicals for whom their entire identity is standing on a street corner wearing a sandwich board that says 'Jesus is Returning'.

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      yea VOA/RFA was (in)famous for spreading anti-communist propaganda in the USSR.

      Show

  • CannotSleep420
    ·
    2 years ago

    You've got to love people who drop links to mediabiasfactcheck as if it helps their argument.

  • robinn2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ignoring this shit or laughing from afar doesn't do anything to change it

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          We did, and that was absolutely more effective at moving people left. So effective they threw us out, so now we're here.

          Having spaces like this is good for a number of reasons, but the only productive use of all this posting energy is trying to get other people on our side (because without that we won't get anything we want). At some point you have to meet people where they are if you want to bring them around.

          • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            If you want to be productive, touch grass. Talk to a neighbor. Posting at people isn’t praxis and federating with shitheads isn’t creating some pipeline to leftism. Make a lemmy account if your raison d’post is to convert liberals

            • GaveUp [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The amount of people converted per poster on CTH and GZD is probably way, way higher than the people converted per American from IRL educating

              The internet is by far the most effective form to deliver propaganda. You should embrace it

              Nobody got tricked into hating DPRK, China or Russia from a person ranting about them IRL. It's all the propaganda from the news, media, social media, etc. delivered primarily on the internet and television

                • Wisp [fae/faer, any]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  I definitely was.

                  quick edit: also isn't that the alt/far right strategy? And it's been working decently well for them. 4chan in general, those weird "feminist owned" videos on youtube, etc.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Do you think anyone changes their mind based on what they read online?

              I'll agree there are better uses of your time, of course, but if you must post (and we wouldn't be here otherwise), try to channel it into a useful direction.

              • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Your definition of useful is not the same as mine. I sincerely hope you do convert people, I just have less tolerance for federation with the type of lib who is so deluded by superiority that they think VoA is “unbiased” “news “

                • GaveUp [she/her]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Do you think the average person that you're talking to irl is going to be any better though?

                  It's the exact same audience

                • SerLava [he/him]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It doesn't have to be praxis it just has to be a ton of fun (and it is)

              • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Absolutely. My parents would always watch 1 or 2 news stations on cable and I was liberal who thought George Bush was stupid but tried his best. Nobody in my town or school was publicly to the left of Obama. Online arguments and online research radicalized me further left than Bernie. His first loss made me realize the tankies were right

            • HauntedBySpectacle [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Having a dedicated community with even the slightest level of coordination, or just a common focus, is way more effective at swaying others than individual accounts doing their thing on a site that will regularly ban them.

            • Frank [he/him, he/him]
              ·
              2 years ago

              We were like the second or third most active sub in posting volume after the NBA sub with like 10 million members.

              Like, yeah, it's just a reddit sub, but I don't think there was anything quite like it in the Anglosphere.

    • dadlips
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • CommCat [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Liberals I can understand, but when the whole Uyghur thing started, I read an article from https://freedomnews.org.uk/ and one of their sources was RFA. It's an Anarchist newsite lol

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don't think its secretarian to call out a specific subset of anarchists. There definitely are anarchists who parrot CIA propaganda like they are actually getting paid. Its fine to criticize that.

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    The western left is such a fucking joke. Every time I read something like this, I sympathize more with third worldists.

    • GaveUp [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don't think these people are left wing lol

        • lmaozedong
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Sator_is_Tense [comrade/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            thinking-about-it i seriously doubt the admin team there are anywhere near devoted to MLism if they run their site like apathetic libs

            • CannotSleep420
              ·
              2 years ago

              The most openly ML ones are the dev maintainers of the project who spend much more time developing than moderating. I can't blame them. Hell, at the height of the reddit exodus, they even set up barriers to joining lemmy.ml so users would sign up on other instances.

  • Sphere [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Someone in that comments section is from an instance hosted at (I shit you not) lib.lgbt

  • Redbolshevik2 [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lmao so lemmy.ml is just completely and irreversibly cooked. That comment section is worse than fucking Reddit.

    • spectre [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      The comment section there sucks ass, but it's neither completely nor irreversibly cooked.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      That's the problem when a huge portion of the people who joined Lemmy from Reddit are extremely liberal, wonky nerds. When they're in Reddit they generally get crowded out by the slightly or overtly fashy nerds so they can't hit you with the "Uhhh sorry sweety but Snopes gave that Russian propaganda 3 pinnocchios" without getting made fun of for how lame they are. Then we don't have the objectively correct and sexy nerds from Hexbear over there to tell them to shut up either, so they roam free. Sad!

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Being optimistic, I think its new function is as a recruiting ground.

  • TheGamingLuddite [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ultimately you have to enforce some kind of political line in terms of website moderation or else liberals will browbeat and concern troll until there's no leftism left.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The US government called VOA propaganda in its own archives.

    306.2 Records of the International Information Administration (Department of State) 1945-53

    History: Office of the Coordinator of Information established as an independent agency by Presidential order, July 11, 1941, to collect and analyze information bearing upon national security. Foreign Information Service established within OCOI to oversee shortwave propaganda broadcasts (Voice of America, VOA)

    From: https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/306.html

  • VILenin [he/him]M
    ·
    2 years ago

    You can't use the truth against people who aren't interested in the truth, just as you can't persuade someone to abandon an insincere belief.

  • Krause [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Liberals are still milking this Wagner mutiny shit, holy shit.

    Is it just to distract from the fact that Ukraine's pathetic counteroffensive failed?

    • huf [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      the counteroffensive cannot fail, it can only be failed...