These look like promos for porn parodies.
Go make porn parodies if that's what you want.
Shoving porn in front of people's faces when they're not looking for it is sexual harassment. Advocating for a world where there's porn everywhere is like being one of those weirdos who can't shut up about your Gor fetish.
The only Gor content anyone should ever be exposed to is the MST3K episode https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkgyvgG2fXs
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I'd be fine with explicit onscreen sex. Just not in this culture or anything remotely like this culture.
Because hetero women having sexual desires they need fulfilled implies that men have to step up and actually care about fulfilling a woman’s needs, and that’s too intimidating/selfless for these dorks. So instead we get either “I’m not that kind of girl!” or sex being purely a social leveraging tool for women.
I remember talking with a boomer family member, and he sort of timidly revealed that he thought most of the women he'd slept with didn't think they were allowed to enjoy sex or relax. He didn't know what to do with that and clearly found it unsettling. Like, even if they knew the problem was there, what tools did they even have surrounded by that society?
And some days it feels like we're headed back there with the recent manifestations of neo-puritanism clawing back at gains made over decades where women are finally allowed to be horny, to enjoy sex, and to demand good sex.
Right? Sex is forbidden, but if it's allowed it has to be violent, shameful, bad, mechanical, or all four. You can fuck but you're not allowed to let anyone see you enjoy fucking.
Most of these were ways to get around the Hayes code when showing sex (or queer people just existing) for decades, and it shapes how Hollywood makes movies until this day because art under capitalism is believed to have to stick to conventions to work as a commodity and Hollywood is particularly bad in that regard.
Right? It's awful. Browse through one of those sites that collects nude scenes in movies and compare how often nudity is used in a scene that is positive and joyful compared to how often it's used for shame, humiliation, violence, weakness.
I think the simple fact that hollywood cannot and will not show an erect penis, ever, is incredibly damning. It's such a banal, innocuous thing, but somehow it's utterly taboo to show a straightforward, visible sign of arousal and excitement during a sex scene!
Even when the characters are having a good time, you rarely see any intimacy. The characters don't smile at each other, giggle, play with each other's hair, pause just to be present. It's so often this incredibly rigid formula, a performance of a performance of a performance of sex.
I've heard a rumor that the mpaa will deny a rating to any movie where someone 1.) Goes down on a woman for more than six seconds and 2.) The woman is obvious having a good time.
Like we have a cultural supreme court that exists specifically to prevent media depictions of sex from being too happy, too loving, too full of wonder and joy and life. Idk if the rumor is true but it sure as hell feels true.
God fuck the MPAA it's such a disgusting, socially violent institution. There's just layers and layers of systems in America devoted to twisting, distorting, and misrepresenting sex and intimacy, a whole fucking bureaucracy to ensure no one ever sees sex in a positive, easy, light, and joyful presentation.
If I wanted to watch pornography, I would open up pornhub, brazzers, or for hentai, joi database, literally anything
Come on, Cons,
make your own ORIGINAL media with that sex shit...BUT don't impose it on every media you consider liberal...Shit I saw some people talk about they wish it was like the older days with more sex scenes etc but there are reasons why nowadays there are intimacy coordinators on the set. Not even against the scenes but I read that sex scenes declined by a large margin 40% or so.... I imagine part of the reason is that several actors/actresses may or may not be comfortable with such scenes. Add while art can take you out of your comfort zone Idk
I remember reading somewhere that when Momoa realized they didn't have a robe ready for Clark between takes of the sex scenes he started screaming at the director to get her something to wear between takes.
you think that may have something to do with it? The nudes she did became less and less each season.
Dragon Tales was great, what are they talking about. That shit slapped when I was five.
Come on, Cons, make your own media with that sex shit...
Don't encourage them. There is no such thing as "art" where a conservative renders something from out of the hatesink that is their brainpan.
Like I'm not gonna front. I'm a grown ass them; I have no issue with sexuality, even to a raunchy, near-pornographic degree involved in artistic pursuits. Some of my favorite fictional novel series are two steps from being straight-up erotica if not for the not sexually-related issues of the overarching plots they have; we don't do that Tipper Gore shit here.
But I would never let a conservative, a republican, an alt-righter, or what have you, anywhere near a pen or keyboard for it.
I think I would, out of a morbid need to know what they would write. Then I would have it sealed forever in the big relic warehouse from Indiana Jones
Man for the party of family values and shit they sure do love shoving sex into everything!
These people (CW: NSFW)
deserve to eat sushi from each other's ass
Uh sure, I guess... (that's for more heinous crimes) though I imagined it differently (CW: butt)
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
At some point I'll just make a novelty account for posting Bill Hicks...until then:
Thank you very much. I'm just trying to rid the world of all these fevered egos that are tainting our collective unconscious... and making us pay a higher psychic price than we imagine. In fact, that's how I pitched it to the networks exactly. I said, uh, "I'd like to do a show where I rid the world of all these fevered egos that are tainting our collective unconscious." And the guy at CBS said, "Will there be titty?" And, uh... I said, "Sure, I don't know, sure." Boom! A check falls in my lap and, uh... I'm a producer. I never knew it was that easy. All these years I've been trying to write scripts and characters and plots and stories that had meaning. "Will there be titty?" "Sure." Boom! I'm a... I'm a producer now. "Where have you been all our lives, boy? We've been looking for you in Hollywood. What are these titties gonna do?" "...jiggle?" "You're a fucking genius. Give him another check! I can't write enough checks for you. You've answered our prayers in Hollywood. Jiggling titties, you woulda thunk of it?"
Disregarding everything else, why did it make Harley Quinn like 3.5 feet tall?
Best explanation honestly. I would love a scene where bats is trying to fight joker but joker has just discovered power-stilts and is bouncing around the room being a goof while, idk, robin is dangling over a pit of acid or whatever.
Good thing for Batman he never had a crossover with Stilt-man
Show
I subscribe to the theory that trying to make something sexy immediately makes it unsexy
Word. We're right back to simulation and simulacra. Does someone actually carry a raw storm of deific sexual energy wherever they go, or have they been clad in hollow symbols of sexuality that were once daring, titilating, challenging, but are now empty of all that?
It's why I like the red carpet trend of sheer tops where your nipples can be seen so much. Its actually someone risque and confrontational after decades of barely there might as well be lingerie red carpet dresses. There's actually still something transgressive about your nipples being visible in public and peopleare actually playing with norms and expectations again, just a little bit. I'm hoping we get a trend towards, like, super baroque elaborate embroidered gowns but oh look, there's a nipple! Because the contrast between highly ornate, complex clothes and "nudity" would be delightful.
Word. Maybe Chapelle Roan will kick off a renassiance of women wearing bespoke armor, that'd be cool and very relevant.
What if there was a clown, but instead of telling jokes, he was horny?
Real ones were already crushing on supergirl in the OG suit. It's already skintight dude, are you that overgooned?
Hetero Sex sells!
We know, the market has been reduced by maybe ~3% or so and you can't fucking shut up about it
This is actually really sad in a way. This is a person who has no one to go to the movies with, no friends or family willing to watch a film with them. I can't imagine someone coming to this conclusion otherwise.
I doubt most people would go to their mum and be like "Hey, want to watch that borderline softcore porn superhero movie with me?"
Do you not remember the 50 Shades of Grey craze?
I'm not discounting your other points- they're valid. Just saying, there are a LOT of people with sexual hangups, and they come in all stripes. Middle aged white women aren't any less creepy in their lust than neckbeards.
That costume on the left looks hella uncomfortable and awkward.
Rewatching Golden Age films really shows how you can make something sexy without taking all your clothes off. Probably the only decent thing to come out of the Hayes Code.
Maybe the discourse on this anti-woke shit should include these undiagnosed porn addictions masquerading as opposition to woke media. What if these men had therapy instead of photoshop.
