Show

Show

Tennessee has recently passed a bill, effective July 1st 2024, declaring it a class-C felony to "recruit, harbor, or transport an unemancipated minor within this state" for transgender healthcare procedures, carrying a sentence of 3-15 years in prison. This applies over state lines and states that do not have anti-extradition laws relating to trans rights can extradite you to Tennessee.

Notably: the bill is vague. This means: telling stories of your own transition, describing your healthcare experiences to an open group chat, describing your trans experiences on a public website, creating trans health guides online, describing how you have gotten DIY HRT, describing anything to do with trans healthcare, even as a cis person, can result in a class-C felony conviction.

Given that being arrested in any capacity for transgender people can be an incredibly dangerous experience (CW: SV), I strongly suggest you begin caring about opsec, stop referring to where you live, use VPNs, stop using apps like Discord, and stop using social media sites that track your IP or user agent fingerprint while unprotected. Remember that for a bill like this to be challenged in court, you have to be arrested first.

Will discuss creating / linking to a transgender matrix chat so that we can help people to move off of things like discord.

  • Babs [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    My current strategy of "stick to the safe states" is starting to feel shakier and shakier.

    I'm fuckin scared yo.

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It's only a matter before a red state tries to extradite a trans person from safe state, which will comply in the spirit of bipartisanship. Or maybe they won't, in which case it will go to the Supreme Court which will rule just the way you expect them to. Fuck this depraved country

      • Rx_Hawk [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Supreme Court might be idiotic assholes but I really doubt they will rule in favor of forced extradition to a different state. This is something pushover blue states might do on their own, but for the federal government to say that state laws apply nationwide would open a can of worms.

        Edit: I was wrong. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-4/section-2/clause-2/overview-of-the-extradition-interstate-rendition-clause

        • Wertheimer [any]
          ·
          8 months ago

          They allowed it when it was to kidnap Bill Haywood big-bill

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Haywood#Extradition

          • Rx_Hawk [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            This is something pushover blue states might do on their own

            Supreme court never ruled that Idaho must extradite him to Colorado. That's what I'm saying is unlikely.

            Arguably, they don't even have the authority to rule in such a way.

            Edit: You know what I did some research and it looks like I'm wrong.

            https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-4/section-2/clause-2/overview-of-the-extradition-interstate-rendition-clause

            The Extradition Clause, which is also referred to as the Interstate Rendition Clause, applies to a person accused of a crime in one state who flees to another state. The Extradition Clause “preclude[s] any state from becoming a sanctuary for fugitives from justice” and “enable[s] each state to bring offenders to trial as swiftly as possible in the state where the alleged offense was committed.”

            • Wertheimer [any]
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yeah, not an exact parallel to what you were arguing given Colorado's complicity, but I figured "Bad state forces extradition by any means necessary, Supreme Court pops up at the end to say 'Actually, that was fine' " was close enough to be ominous.

              Thanks for the link. Perhaps also relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugitive_Felon_Act

        • VILenin [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          They can simply say it applies in this case but not in the others. It doesn’t need to be consistent or make any internal sense. The hardest part is coming up with the bullshit about how this is implied by the constitution.

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    i don't even have words for this one other than yea. shit's getting worse, the dems will refuse to do anything, and unless some serious left wing labor/political org can get formed real fast real quick then there's basically nothing we can do about it

    God damn America, that's in the bible

    • wild_dog
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

  • IMF_DOOM [she/her, undecided]
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe cross post this onto blahaj zone (even though some of the users are weird pissy freaks about hexbears posting there, it's probably important enough to get them aware of this and stuff)

      • VILenin [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        "Your content can be seen in Tennessee. Guilty!"

        At this point they'll try to extradite international posters for existing while trans

  • BountifulEggnog [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know this is serious, but I eagerly await Biden's response. He cares about trans rights, doesn't he?

    • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      8 months ago

      He hasn't said jack shit while trans and their allies are systemically incriminated across the country, hexs too busy comittng multiple genocides. He hears you. He sees you. He just Does Not Care.

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    This applies over state lines and states that do not have anti-extradition laws relating to trans rights can extradite you to Tennessee.

    Is there a place where I can check which states do/don't have said laws? or is that included in that first map you posted?

    • bleepbloopbop [they/them]
      ·
      8 months ago

      my advice would be do not count on any state protecting you. Do your best to protect yourself and those around you first. Even in those states with good laws, there is no guarantee they will cover things like: actions committed in another state, actions taken as a third party (not doctor or patient) to facilitate trans care, actions facilitating DIY HRT (could probably be treated as drug trafficking), etc.

      But yeah I think that first map more or less lines up with the anti-extradition/anti-subpoena type laws that are on the books.

      • wild_dog
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        deleted by creator

          • wild_dog
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            deleted by creator

            • bleepbloopbop [they/them]
              ·
              8 months ago

              I couldn't tell you. WI did elect a dem governor (because statewide races can't be gerrymandered like they did all the districts), but I don't know if that was an outgrowth of an organized state party or just resentment against like 10 straight years of republican rule, esp. in the more populous cities

  • TheDoctor [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If you or anyone needs help setting these things up or creating guides please reach out. I’d be happy to help.

    • kristina [she/her]
      hexagon
      M
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      If a minor from Tennessee reads it, it's possible if it's not on that map. I'm sure some psychoes might use their kids to try to mess with trans people in this way

      Technically if you ever travel to one of the bad states you could also be extradited. Only 14 states have protection

        • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
          ·
          8 months ago

          there's no point asking that question, the supreme court just does the mental gymnastics necessary to make something constitutional or not.

            • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              That's old hat now

              In an 8-1 ruling, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require immigration judges to hold bond hearings after six months to determine if a non-citizen should be released while their case proceeds or is a flight risk or danger to the community. Agreeing with the Biden administration, Sotomayor said there was "no plausible construction of the text" of the statute that would mandate the government provide for such bond hearings and that the law did not even hint at such a requirement.

              In a separate decision, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that federal district courts lack the authority to issue injunctions to force the government to release immigrants after 180 days without a bond hearing on a class-wide basis.

              The decision reversed the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld decisions by judges in California and Washington barring the government from detaining immigrants without bond headings after 180 days.

              I don't think I need to tell you what the aggregate meaning of those two decisions is

    • StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      IANAL, if it's like recording laws (basing on swift v Kanye) then no, as long as you are not in TN a when you post it's not a crime

      I didn't read the op well enough 🎵

      • kristina [she/her]
        hexagon
        M
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This law is based on abortion extradition laws

    • bleepbloopbop [they/them]
      ·
      8 months ago

      As long as you don't want to run your own server or join a specific one (you probably don't), you just go to https://app.element.io/, or install element on your phone or computer, and click Create Account.

      Once you're in, you can message directly with other people on any matrix server, join spaces (which work like discord's "servers", and join chat rooms (which are just one-off channels that don't belong to a space)

      The only other thing you may or may not want to change is what app you use to access matrix. On desktop I like Nheko but I don't have any mobile recs besides Element (for context, Element is the chat app developed by the same people who created the matrix protocol and the matrix.org homeserver, so it's basically the default for everything, but other options are getting pretty mature, like Nheko). You aren't tied to just one though so feel free to hop around.

      • alexandra_kollontai [she/her]M
        ·
        8 months ago

        SchildiChat is my favourite app to access Matrix on computer and android. https://schildi.chat

        All the apps connect to your same Matrix account, so you can always switch apps later or try them out side-by-side without losing any data. stalin-approval

    • Avoly@lemmy.today
      ·
      8 months ago

      It's just federated chat. You sign up and join a server and choose a mobile app if you need one same as with penny lemmy then use it like a chat app.